Re: Comparison Test: 1984 Ferrari 308 GTSi vs. 2007 Kia Sedona EX | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: misc (misc![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:51:22 -0700 (PDT) |
Heck, my 69 Pontiac Firebird convertible(400/4spd) will beat my 85 Ferrari 308 off the line. However, if I drove the Firebird like the Ferrari in the Colorado twisties around here I would need a pilots license for all the airtime I would have over the river! Also, interestingly, my Ferrari consistently beat the Vipers at Laguna Seca during track day a few years ago. They would gain ground on the front straight, then I would pull away in the curves. Every lap I gained approximately 50 ft on them.... But in the end, beauty is why I own the 308, and when given the choice of a ride to day care, my son always says "The Ferrari Dad"! Mark Lueker 85 308 > Matt already sent the link around, but here is the full text. While the > Ferrari "beat" the Kia Sedona in performance, keep in mind that (a) the > Ferrari was wearing modern Goodyear rubber and not the 1984 version, which > would most assuredly have reduced lateral grip and slalom performance > dramatically. Also, (b) as the article itself notes, the Toyota RAV4 is > pretty close, and that little cute-'ute will haul 6 folks (well, 4+2) > *and* > keep everyone nice and chilled with working a/c. > > Not to knock the 308qv, of course, just to point out how far we've come. > You can go out and buy a five-passenger uber-sedan today that will smoke a > 355. > > Vty, > > --Dennis > > > > > http://www.edmunds.com/apps/vdpcontainers/do/vdp/articleId=122612/pageNumber > =1 > > Comparison Test: 1984 Ferrari 308 GTSi vs. 2007 Kia Sedona EX > Who's got it better, Magnum or Mom? > > By Josh Jacquot, Senior Road Test Editor > Date posted: 09-16-2007 > > Comparing a minivan to a Ferrari is surely absurd to some. Who cares? > Those > people never got girls in high school. Their idea of kooky, crazy fun is a > red Prius. Tell them to have another soy milk latte and stick to reading > www.lactoseintolerant.org, the Web site for the lactose-intolerant. > > There's a real question to be answered here: How far has the automobile > progressed in 23 years? Can a new minivan outrun a two-decade-old > supercar? > > Sure it's stupid, but that's the point. > > Dollars and Sense > To get the show on the road we called Kia and borrowed this Sedona. We > chose > the Kia because it was the quickest accelerating of the group in our 2006 > Minivan Comparison Test. It also had the fastest slalom speed, produced > the > third best lateral acceleration and was the least expensive. So, as > minivans > go, it's an outright performance bargain. > > Now we needed an outdated, crusty old exotic. Enter our long-term 1984 > Ferrari 308 GTSi. Magnum, P.I.'s car. The car entire movies were made for. > The car that delivered a naked Christie Brinkley to Clark W. Griswold, for > crying out loud. It's got a shrieking, midmounted Italian V8 powered by > pure > testosterone. It's got a body by Pininfarina. It's Rosso Corsa red. And > most > importantly, it's nothing like a minivan. > > But it does cost the same as one. > > This Kia Sedona costs $31,995. Opt out of the $2,400 Luxury Package and > $1,700 Premium Entertainment Package, however, and its price dips below > the > $28,000 we paid for the Ferrari. And you still get to keep the $1,000 > Power > Package that gives you power-sliding doors and a power liftgate. > > Respecting Physics > Dimensionally, there aren't two more different automobiles. With a > wheelbase > more than 2 feet longer than the Ferrari's (118.9 inches vs. 92.1), the > Sedona is, quite simply, large. It's about 3 feet longer, 2 feet taller > and > 10 inches wider than the Ferrari. Then there's the matter of its > additional > 1,500 pounds of curb weight (4,686 pounds vs. 3,186). > > Ironically, their engines make similar power (or at least they did when > the > Ferrari was new). The Sedona's 3.8-liter V6 is rated at 250 horsepower and > 253 pound-feet of torque. The Ferrari's 3.0-liter (actually 2.9) V8 is > rated > at 230 hp and 188 lb-ft of torque. Our Ferrari is a Quattrovalvole GTSi > model, which means it's got the four-valve engine and uses Bosch fuel > injection. It's hardly new. In fact, during this test, it ticked over > 49,000 > miles. > > Kia gave the Sedona a five-speed automatic transmission with manual shift > abilities. It puts power down through the front wheels. The Ferrari's > five-speed manual transaxle has a ZF limited-slip differential and > delivers > power to the rear wheels. > > And the minivan wears the larger rubber. Its Michelins measure 235/60R17. > The Ferrari wears Goodyears. Why? Because Mr. Ferrari wanted it that way. > But they're an inch smaller in diameter than the Kia's tires, and quite a > bit narrower (205/55ZR16 front and 225/50ZR16 rear). > > Performance > As we headed for the track, staff predictions leaned in favor of the > Sedona. > Many who had driven the Ferrari were convinced the Kia was going to walk > away with the acceleration tests. Some even extended the van's dominance > to > the braking tests where, they claimed, its modern ABS would laugh in the > face of the Ferrari's dated, non-ABS equipped stoppers. > > In reality, the Ferrari kicked the minivan's ass in every test. > Twenty-three > years is a long time and, yes, the van benefits supremely from modern > advances, but it still ain't no Ferrari on the track. In 1984, this 308 > really must have been something. > > The biggest ass-kickin' came in the handling tests, where the Ferrari > proved > its pedigree by slithering through the slalom at 68.6 mph, almost 1 mph > faster than the 2008 Subaru WRX and far better than any minivan we've ever > tested. The story was similar around the skid pad, where the Ferrari's > modern Goodyear Eagle F1 tires yanked it around at 0.91g. The Sedona > squealed its way to 0.72g. > > In a straight line it wasn't much closer. Seriously, did you ever see > Magnum > get outrun by a soccer mom? The Ferrari hit 60 mph in only 7.3 seconds - a > number we likely could have improved if we were more willing to abuse its > aging clutch. The Sedona managed the same milestone in 9.0 seconds. By the > end of the quarter-mile, the gap had extended to 1.3 seconds, with the > Ferrari breaking the traps in 15.4 seconds at 92.1 mph and the Sedona > finishing in 16.7 seconds at 84.6 mph. > > Even the braking contest, where ABS is invaluable, fell in the Ferrari's > favor. A solid, easily modulated pedal allowed the Ferrari to stop from 60 > mph in just 123 feet, 5 feet shorter than the Sedona. > > In other words, our Ferrari goes and stops as well as a V6 Toyota RAV4, > which means the car has come damn far in the last 23 years. Just not quite > as far as we had thought. A 2008 Ferrari F430 would, of course, run > circles > around our 308. > > Living > With our theory validated, or invalidated, depending on your degree of > cynicism, we took this ridiculous exercise a step further. That's right. > We > made it a full-blown comparison test with scoring and everything. > > Don't laugh. After driving both cars for a week it became clear that the > Kia > had a real shot. It's by far the easier of the two to live with every day. > Take the four cupholders within reach of the driver, for example. Between > them they've got more liquid capacity than the Ferrari's entire cooling > system. And they're better at keeping things cool, too. The 308 has > exactly > zero cupholders, by the way. It also has zero airbags (the Sedona has > six), > zero power steering and practically zero air-conditioning. > > Then there's the cargo capacity issue. The Ferrari has zero. Well, not > exactly zero. Between its trunk and a bit of space behind the seats, the > 308 > has the cargo room of a large Gucci diaper bag. And it's even less > practical. Don't put anything in the trunk you don't want cooked. We > actually baked some Betty Crocker cookies back there during our track > test. > This isn't a problem in the Sedona. We packed lots of Girl Scout Cookies > in > our long-term Sedona earlier this year. They didn't even get warm. > > Then there's the expected wear that comes with any 23-year-old car. The > Ferrari's ventilation controls are worn and awkward and the ignition and > door lock cylinders are sticky and require patience. And good luck getting > in or out without some sort of yoga training. > > On the Road > With a surprisingly comfortable ride, the 308 is actually a joy on a long > drive, provided it's not more than 80 degrees outside. But it has its > moments of glory. Find yourself on a winding road on a cool evening and > even > the 308's dead-on-center steering has some redeeming value. It's easy to > get > lost in the Italian's burble-come-shriek exhaust note while rowing through > the gears in the right conditions. > > The only way the Sedona could offer this much manly satisfaction is if it > were loaded with five naked members of the Hawaiian Tropic bikini team and > driven over a series of speed bumps. Repeatedly. > > But the Sedona's road manners are respectable. An impromptu mountain road > face-off against the 308 proved it a worthy contender - for a few minutes. > Shifting its automatic transmission manually allows better control than in > most minivans and it's admirably quick. It held its own until the flames > coming off its front brake calipers forced us to surrender to the slippery > Italian. > > Fuel mileage was a contest won by the boxy Sedona, although its 16.7 mpg > average isn't exactly going to impress the Sierra Club. The Ferrari > averaged > 14.9 mpg during the week, but it would crack 16 mpg on the highway. > > The End of This Ridiculous Story > In the end, it comes down to the modern convenience and usability of the > Sedona versus the passionate pull of the Ferrari. > > It's the choice every man faces come midlife crisis. The family is getting > bigger, the old sedan just won't cut it anymore and the need for a minivan > looms large on the horizon. Enter the hulking, stigma-ridden reality of > the > 2007 Kia Sedona. The price is right, the warranty is incredible and it's > got > good reviews. > > But with the rational need for more space, stain-resistant surfaces and > self-closing doors comes the undeniable urge for something svelte, red, > mid-engined and...Italian. > > We've already bought our Ferrari. Which would you choose? > > Kia provided Edmunds the Sedona for the purposes of evaluation. We own the > Ferrari. > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/misc%40308systems.com > > Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > http://www.BidNip.com/ > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ >
-
Comparison Test: 1984 Ferrari 308 GTSi vs. 2007 Kia Sedona EX Dennis Liu, September 19 2007
- Re: Comparison Test: 1984 Ferrari 308 GTSi vs. 2007 Kia Sedona EX misc, September 19 2007
-
Re: Comparison Test: 1984 Ferrari 308 GTSi vs. 2007 Kia Sedona EX jimshadow, September 19 2007
- Re: Comparison Test: 1984 Ferrari 308 GTSi vs. 2007 Kia Sedona EX Dennis Liu, September 19 2007
-
Re: Comparison Test: 1984 Ferrari 308 GTSi vs. 2007 Kia Sedona EX LS, September 19 2007
- Re: Comparison Test: 1984 Ferrari 308 GTSi vs. 2007 KiaSedona EX jimshadow, September 19 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.