Re: *** SPOILER *** OZ GRAND PRIX *** SPOILER *** | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rick Lindsay (rolindsay![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 09:39:06 -0700 (PDT) |
Clyde wrote, --- clyderomero [at] worldnet.att.net wrote: > I agree mu quess is after there is a serious crash > in turn one like SPA this no traction control will > go away ...and that may be true but I'd rather think that what happened in Melbourne is, (1) Ferrari's engines aren't quite stable yet and, (2) A whole bunch of talented drivers just learned that there is a honkin-big difference between practicing against the clock, without driver aids, and dicing with 20+ other racers AND having to deal with a car just being a car. What I expect is that instead of reinstalling driver aids (in the short term), the drivers will learn to be more cautious WHILE competing. That may be counter to what the F1 Management wanted. It may make more boring races, not more competitive driving. Opinions? rick PS: Personally, I'd like F1 to follow the old CanAm model and be free to do anything technologically that they please!
-
*** SPOILER *** OZ GRAND PRIX *** SPOILER *** red5hilser, March 16 2008
-
Re: *** SPOILER *** OZ GRAND PRIX *** SPOILER *** ken rentiers, March 16 2008
-
Re: *** SPOILER *** OZ GRAND PRIX *** SPOILER *** clyderomero, March 16 2008
- Re: *** SPOILER *** OZ GRAND PRIX *** SPOILER *** Rick Lindsay, March 16 2008
-
Re: *** SPOILER *** OZ GRAND PRIX *** SPOILER *** clyderomero, March 16 2008
-
Re: *** SPOILER *** OZ GRAND PRIX *** SPOILER *** ken rentiers, March 16 2008
- Re: *** SPOILER *** OZ GRAND PRIX *** SPOILER *** Hans E. Hansen, March 16 2008
-
Re: *** SPOILER *** OZ GRAND PRIX *** SPOILER *** JAshburne, March 17 2008
- Re: *** SPOILER *** OZ GRAND PRIX *** SPOILER *** Doug and Terri Anderson, March 17 2008
- Re: *** SPOILER *** OZ GRAND PRIX *** SPOILER *** LarryT, March 17 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.