Re: Betrayal of Journalists | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Paul Bennett (pbennett![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:22:22 -0700 (PDT) |
The right vs left issue is pure and simple ' a greed ' thing. I know first hand the university changeover began in the sixties when professors earned less than high school teachers. They set out to correct an earning inequity ... they did but the mind-set stuck. Then imposed the thought police to protect it. Media has daily contact with people who earn more than they do. They say to themselves "I'm just as good as him - his money obviously comes from xxx" Then write the story emphasizing the human flaws. Note the dems now have more money than the rubs. and also note the proponderance of dems with money inherited it... didn't earn it and are still jealous. Human groups have flawed individuals and appeal to others with the same flaws. Using elaborate covers, Libs appeal to that greed factor. What goads me is the continual redefining of words to support their position (a moving target), and then assume the rest of the world is dumber. Recalling that half the world has an IQ under 100... well ... Always read dollars for power, power for dollars. I.e. Follow the dollars = follow the power. Having and earning are not the same, earning is transient and can be attacked. Note earning is taxed but having is not. My earning is zero and my having is mighty thin, so my sight is clear. After an F1 drought, a most boring qualification...sure hope the race heats up.
- Re: Betrayal of Journalists, (continued)
- Re: Betrayal of Journalists red5hilser, March 15 2008
- Re: Betrayal of Journalists LarryT, March 15 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.