Re: All about oil???? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: LarryT (l02turner![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:10:13 -0700 (PDT) |
Hans wrote << measurement temp is 212deg F - why it's related to water
boiling temp
Hi Hans,
One of the tests performed in our Oil Analysis is the viscosity of the sample measured at 100C. As you say, it may a semi-arbitrary number but I believe a number around the upper end of the operating spectrum needed to be used - so we know what the viscosity will be when our engines are at their hottest (hopefully). We probably converted to 212F just because it's more familiar.
If interested, you can look at some tests performed on new oil straight from the bottle - there are several tests like this - 4 IIRC - with different types of oil. You can compare what the engines different weights are at 100C to get an idea of what the oils do as they age. The number of miles on each sample is also shown if provided by the customer.
The test results can be found at http://members.rennlist.com/oil which is always in my sig lines.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Hans E. Hansen" <FList [at] hanshansen.org>
To: "Larry Turner" <l02turner [at] comcast.net>
Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] All about oil????
is anyone's guess>>
Hi Hans,
One of the tests performed in our Oil Analysis is the viscosity of the sample measured at 100C. As you say, it may a semi-arbitrary number but I believe a number around the upper end of the operating spectrum needed to be used - so we know what the viscosity will be when our engines are at their hottest (hopefully). We probably converted to 212F just because it's more familiar.
If interested, you can look at some tests performed on new oil straight from the bottle - there are several tests like this - 4 IIRC - with different types of oil. You can compare what the engines different weights are at 100C to get an idea of what the oils do as they age. The number of miles on each sample is also shown if provided by the customer.
The test results can be found at http://members.rennlist.com/oil which is always in my sig lines.
Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D) www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil PORSCHE POSTERS! youroil.net 800-583-8601 Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs
----- Original Message ----- From: "Hans E. Hansen" <FList [at] hanshansen.org>
To: "Larry Turner" <l02turner [at] comcast.net>
Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] All about oil????
Well, remember, viscosity is viscosity - old or new, dino or synthetic. So
the measured viscosity of a modern synthetic 5w40 when hot (I believe
the measurement temp is 212deg F - why it's related to water boiling temp
is anyone's guess....) is the same as the measured viscosity of 40
dino oil - old
or new - at that temp. A 10W50 dino would be thicker than a 5w40 synthetic at
the hot *measurement* temp, because it measures 50 while the synthetic
measures 40. But if either were to get hotter, the synthetic wins.
It's kind of an unfortunate rating system, because it's confusing. The viscosity number is just an assigned number based upon some measurements. It's not an actual measurement. That's why we are seeing some 0W30, etc. oils coming out. Even thinner oils are being made, but the old labeling system won't really support them. You'd have to label them "-10W30" or somesuch, which is blatently stupid, as you can't have negative viscosity.
The old system was invented to label single weight dino oil. 20W, 30W, etc. These oils had known temperature characteristics, so it was expected that they would be thinner at elevated temp. What happened is that somebody invented viscosity improvers and looked for a way to label the 'new and improved' oil. So - if we take our new viscosity improved oil and compare it at room temp to regular oil, we see, for example, that it is the same as a 20W. Now we heat up both our 'new and improved' oil as well as various reference single weight oils. Our new oil at 212deg behaves like 50W at 212deg. Both are thinner, but our improved oil when hot is like 50W when hot, and when cold it is like 20W when cold. So let's call it 20W50.
The so-called multiweight oils are a huge improvement. In the old single weight days, the manufacturer would specify, say, 20W. Since the engine usually is operated hot, this 20W, when thinned due to heat, was optimum. But it was way too thick when cold. And if the motor got too warm, say towing a trailer or when raced, the oil thinned too much. Racers typically used 50W. The multi viscosity oils allow for something that is much thinner when cold, which is good, as it flows better.
I would definitely look at the 2nd number when comparing oils to manufacturer's recommendations. This is the viscosity at operating temp. If Ferrari wanted 50W when hot, that's what I'm going to use. You have some flexibility with the 1st number, as just about any oil is probably too thick when cold.
Hans.
On 3/25/08, Peter Pless <ferrarilist [at] pless.com.au> wrote:Wait...that being the case, then maybe at a high temp, a 5w40 synthetic will
be just as thick as a 10W50 mineral grade ferrari was recommending in
1977!!!....with the advantage of it being thinner when the engine's cold
(which is a good thing)
What do you think?
I know carl jones ran 5W40 in his glass GTB and even though it's broken due
to some very bad fuel, the bores and bearings looked like new after (I
think) 70,000km!
Maybe that's the answer?? When the oil gets really hot (and ferrari has to
protect its engine) the mineral 50 weight got much thinner than the 40
weight synthetic??
Does any of this make sense, or should I get more sleep?
-----Original Message----- From: Hans E. Hansen [mailto:FList [at] hanshansen.org] Sent: Wednesday, 26 March 2008 11:17 AM To: Peter Pless Cc: The FerrariList Subject: Re: [Ferrari] All about oil????
On 3/25/08, Peter Pless <ferrarilist [at] pless.com.au> wrote: > Ok...well that just scared the crap out of me! > > I'd still like to know what they'd specify for a 308 if it were made > TODAY considering the advances in oil technology. >
Sure, oil technology has come a long, long way. But viscosity is viscosity,
old or new. What has changed on the viscosity front is now there is much
less change (particularly with synthetic...) from cold to hot. But the
measurement system essentially takes care of that. The viscosities at the
two temps where the two numbers (10W50, for example) are measured is same
now as 50 years ago.
But at temps either much below or much above those measurement points, newer
oil is a lot better. Plus, older oils would burn up at temps where
synthetics are just hitting their stride.......
One huge advantage to synthetics (and to some extent the 'hybrid'
blends) is that "viscosity improvers" were necessary in dino oil to achieve
a multi weight rating. Synthetics just naturally have the characteristics
of a multi weight. For example, a 10W synthetic has the same viscosity as
10W dino at room temperature, but when hot the synthetic doesn't thin as
much. So the 10W synthetic naturally behaves like a 50W (or whatever -
example made up!) dino oil at elevated temps because the hot 50W dino has
thinned excessively.
Hans. _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/ferrarilist%40pless.com .au
Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper http://www.BidNip.com/ and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/flist%40hanshansen.org
Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper http://www.BidNip.com/ and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/l02turner%40comcast.net
Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper
http://www.BidNip.com/
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/
- Re: Custom Wheels, (continued)
- Re: Custom Wheels David G. Cole, March 27 2008
- Re: Custom Wheels Jim Brown, March 27 2008
- Re: Custom Wheels LS, March 27 2008
- Message not available
- Re: Custom Wheels David G. Cole, March 27 2008
- Re: All about oil???? LarryT, March 25 2008
- Re: All about oil???? Jeff Greenfield, March 25 2008
- Re: All about oil???? Matt Boyd, March 25 2008
- Re: All about oil???? LarryT, March 26 2008
- Message not available
- Re: All about oil???? Paul Bennett, March 25 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.