Re: Porsche 917-30 vs. Ferrari 612 vs. UOP Shadow Turbo? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Hans E. Hansen (FList![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 09:23:40 -0700 (PDT) |
PS: Back somewhere in the mid-1980s, I saw a magazine article in some publication like Popular Mechanics that said Porsche had bought the rights to use the alloy big block Chevy race motor for aviation use. I never heard another thing about this, but it would certainly be strange if true. Hans. On 8/5/08, Hans E. Hansen <FList [at] hanshansen.org> wrote: > I used to sell aluminum big block Chevies. Technically, the motors used > in CanAm were not ZL1. The ZL1 was the alum motor fitted in the Corvette, > and was nothing more than an iron sleeved alloy version of the cast iron > 427. ie - the castings resembled each other and the internal parts were > the same. > > The CanAm engines were available in 430, 465, 495, and I think 510 > cu in. Initially sleeved, some were available, as I understand (never > saw one...), in a sleeveless silicon etched alloy, like used in the 928 > and some (many?) BMWs. The blocks were A LOT different than > the regular big block, being gusseted, reinforced, etc., and with > different internals such as much bigger bearings, etc. Heads were > different, and not interchangeable with the rest of the big block > lineup. > > Externally, they probably were a bolt-in replacement for a regular > big block. I say "probably", because I never saw anybody put one > in a Chevelle, for example, simply because the parts cost was Ferrari > level extravagant. Like $20K - $25K in 1980 dollars. I have no idea > what an assembled race-ready motor would cost, but it was > certainly north of $50K. Still cheap by Porsche/Ferrari race car > standards, but way out of reach for the street rodder. > > New Chevy pickups use a 495 cu in motor. I've wondered, but never > bothered to look, if might be a cast iron version of the old CanAm > motor, complete with the bigger bearings and other internals of > that motor. If done to production car specs (not race spec...), the > cost would only be marginally higher than the original big block, > but it would be much sturdier than the regular big block. The pickup > 454 was not well suited to truck use, especially in our area where > full throttle for 10 minutes at a time is needed to pull big loads > up our mountains. The 495 seems to be holding up much better > in this application, suggesting that it might be a "civilian" version > of the old race motor. > > Hans. > > On 8/5/08, LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> wrote: > > Does anyone have any good info on the potential of the turbo ZL1 that > > McLaren and Shadow were developing for Can Am when the series was cancelled? > > > > I'm reading the Unfair Advantage by Mark Donohue and was intrigued at the > > possibility of some sort of competition from the McLaren's for the > > almightly 917-30. > > > > The Aluminum ZL1 was an impressive engine...did it have the architecture to > > handle a 2-3 hour road race with forced induction? I'd like some info on > > what setup some of the teams were experimenting with. > > > > BTW-What was the real power output of the 712 Can Am Ferrari? I've heard > > 680-750bhp. > > > > LS > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/flist%40hanshansen.org > > > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > > and F1 Headlines > > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > > >
-
Porsche 917-30 vs. Ferrari 612 vs. UOP Shadow Turbo? LS, August 5 2008
-
Re: Porsche 917-30 vs. Ferrari 612 vs. UOP Shadow Turbo? Hans E. Hansen, August 5 2008
- Re: Porsche 917-30 vs. Ferrari 612 vs. UOP Shadow Turbo? Hans E. Hansen, August 5 2008
- Message not available
- Re: Porsche 917-30 vs. Ferrari 612 vs. UOP Shadow Turbo? Hans E. Hansen, August 8 2008
-
Re: Porsche 917-30 vs. Ferrari 612 vs. UOP Shadow Turbo? Hans E. Hansen, August 5 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.