NFC: Irony of Ironies | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rich (Rich355![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:32:07 -0800 (PST) |
Leftists in Oregon despise SUV's, but because of their recent record snowfall, and the city's inability to remove the snow, only SUV drivers were able to get around Portland and help snowbound people in need. Even the local paper pointed this out to the Loco leftists that run the city and infest it's neigborhoods. Gotta love it ! Wanna bet they have an SUV tax too in the works soon. Rich Paying the price in a 'city that (not always) works' Posted by gbarnett December 31, 2008 17:20PM Dave Lister http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2008/12/paying_the_price_in_a_city_tha.html I take seriously the responsibilities of being a good citizen. During November's leaf fall, I dutifully donned my galoshes and raked the leaves from the storm drain by my house several times a day to keep the water flowing. A week ago on Christmas Day, I chopped the ice and shoveled the snow off my sidewalk so pedestrians would be safe. I even considered tackling the 3-foot berm left by the city's snowplow that was keeping all of us trapped in the neighborhood. But I knew it was beyond my physical capabilities. As I contemplated another day under winter house arrest with our Christmas celebrations postponed, I became bitter. I was doing my part, but was the city doing its part? During our 12 days of Christmas storm, local media praised the valiant efforts of personnel from both Portland's and Oregon's transportation departments as well as TriMet for keeping the city moving. I share that praise. Those folks were doing absolutely the best they could with what they had to work with. But what they have to work with is determined by the policymakers and planners who oversee them. Considering that a third of our city's public transportation system was down, virtually all side streets were impassable and trash collection was suspended for two weeks, I give those planners and policymakers a solid "F." Being told to wait for the thaw is not acceptable. PDOT spent about $2 million keeping the major arterials open during the storm. Mayor Sam Adams (formerly transportation commissioner and who, as mayor, is going to keep the Office of Transportation under his control) has expressed concern about covering that unexpected expense. But let's put it in perspective. The city's all-funds budget is about $3 billion. The general fund is about $500 million. Four-tenths of 1 percent of the general fund covers the storm. Then consider other city spending. Mayor Tom Potter's visioning project cost $1.5 million. The engineering study for the Burnside-Couch couplet, an idea that does not seem to be wildly popular, came in at $2.4 million. Had our leadership forgone just those two items, PDOT would have had double the resources for the storm. They say that plowing the side streets along with the main streets would have cost a million dollars a day. But 10 days of that would still cost only 2 percent of the general fund budget, and I don't believe for a minute that way more than 2 percent is not routinely squandered on ridiculous budget items every year. The economic impact of the storm, not only on the private sector but also to the city and to TriMet, is huge. Dan Yates, president of the Portland Spirit, reports that cancellations of holiday cruises resulted in the loss of nearly 8,000 payroll hours and a quarter-million in revenue. And that's just one business. When you consider all of the lost payroll and revenue dollars for holiday-dependent retailing, restaurants and service work, the impact is incalculable. TriMet, primarily funded by payroll taxes, will take a huge revenue hit, as will Portland because of lost business tax revenue. The argument, of course, is that this was a once in 40-year event. In terms of snowfall it was. But it wasn't a rare event in terms of the impact on the city. I've lived every one of my 54 years right here in Portland, and we get a good winter storm every three or four years. And every three or four years "the city that works" stops working while we wait for the thaw. Our policymakers have worked hard to convince us that we don't need cars. Both Potter and Adams have stated flatly that we need to force people out of their cars. The message is that cars are somehow evil, and none is more evil than a gas-guzzling, carbon dioxide-belching SUV. With the mass-transit system down and small cars unable to get to the main streets, isn't it ironic that the only people getting around reliably during the storm were driving SUVs? Adams recently stated that climate change may increase the frequency of Portland's winter storms. In addition to possibly acquiring more snow-removal equipment, alerting riders to bus and MAX disruptions by cell phone and increasing stockpiles of de-icing chemicals, he wants to develop a database of volunteers who will be willing to help people get around. Those volunteers will be driving -- you guessed it -- SUVs. Dave Lister is co-founder of Integrated Data Concepts and a contributing editor to Brainstorm NW magazine.
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.