Re: Stimulus | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rich (Rich355![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:54:42 -0800 (PST) |
Obama already promised a " tax cut" for 95 % of Americans, even though only
54 % actually pay federal taxes. Thus those other 41 % are actually getting
a check from others pay for nothing . That used to be called a welfare
handout and marxist redistributionism, before the holy one came to town .
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Lindsay" <rolindsay [at] yahoo.com>
To: "Rich" <rich355 [at] comcast.net> Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 6:49 PM Subject: [Ferrari] Stimulus
I didn't get the last stimulus treat (the one that didn't work) nor did my son. I won't get this one either. I make too much money and he makes too little. So WHY does what we earn have ANYTHING to do with whether we spend the money - and therefore cause the stimulation, which is the stated purpose?It's much simpler than generic logic. If they gave the package to people who work their asses off and actually earn a good salary, the rest would complain - even though those with ample income are MORE likely to blow the stimulus money on trivial crap. What a bunch of dumb asses. And they wonder WHY citizens have lost confidence in our government! They're just plain, common, generic dickheads.rick _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/rich355%40comcast.net Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlineshttp://www.F1Headlines.com/
-
Stimulus Rick Lindsay, January 9 2009
- Re: Stimulus Rich, January 9 2009
-
Stimulus rolindsay, January 10 2009
-
Re: Stimulus Ken Rentiers, January 10 2009
- Re: Stimulus Erik Nielsen, January 16 2009
-
Re: Stimulus Ken Rentiers, January 10 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.