Re: Stimulus
From: Rich (Rich355comcast.net)
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:54:42 -0800 (PST)
Obama already promised a " tax cut" for 95 % of Americans, even though only 54 % actually pay federal taxes. Thus those other 41 % are actually getting a check from others pay for nothing . That used to be called a welfare handout and marxist redistributionism, before the holy one came to town .


----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Lindsay" <rolindsay [at] yahoo.com>
To: "Rich" <rich355 [at] comcast.net>
Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 6:49 PM
Subject: [Ferrari] Stimulus


I didn't get the last stimulus treat (the one that didn't work) nor did my son. I won't get this one either. I make too much money and he makes too little. So WHY does what we earn have ANYTHING to do with whether we spend the money - and therefore cause the stimulation, which is the stated purpose?

It's much simpler than generic logic. If they gave the package to people who work their asses off and actually earn a good salary, the rest would complain - even though those with ample income are MORE likely to blow the stimulus money on trivial crap. What a bunch of dumb asses. And they wonder WHY citizens have lost confidence in our government! They're just plain, common, generic dickheads.

rick

_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/rich355%40comcast.net

Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.