Re: LA Times: Dan Neil on heel-and-toe shifting and the Nissan 370Z | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rick Lindsay (rolindsay![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:25:25 -0800 (PST) |
You know, a lot of this thread was written after F.G. commented (paraphrasing) that some car "...would be better if it had a manual gearbox." I then said that modern automatic gear selection systems are superior to manual gearboxes - if your standard of excellence is absolute performance. I went on to say that if your standard of ENJOYMENT is playing with the shifter, listening to the exhaust note and heel-n-toe down-shifting, then by all means, go for a system with a manual gear selector in the cockpit. (After all, if it was good enough for drivers in 1930, its good enough for drivers today!) :-P The only point I am trying to make is that we can argue until the end of days and we still won't agree because the real difference is in the shifting system, its the definition of the word "better". rick
-
LA Times: Dan Neil on heel-and-toe shifting and the Nissan 370Z Dennis Liu, February 10 2009
-
Re: LA Times: Dan Neil on heel-and-toe shifting and the Nissan 370Z Fellippe Galletta, February 11 2009
- Re: LA Times: Dan Neil on heel-and-toe shifting and the Nissan 370Z Rick Lindsay, February 12 2009
- Re: LA Times: Dan Neil on heel-and-toe shifting and theNissan 370Z Charles Perry, February 12 2009
- Re: LA Times: Dan Neil on heel-and-toe shifting andtheNissan 370Z Doug and Terri Anderson, February 12 2009
- Re: LA Times: Dan Neil on heel-and-toe shiftingandtheNissan 370Z clyderomero, February 12 2009
-
Re: LA Times: Dan Neil on heel-and-toe shifting and the Nissan 370Z Fellippe Galletta, February 11 2009
- Re: LA Times: Dan Neil on heel-and-toe shifting and the Nissan 370Z Red5hilser, February 12 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.