Re: Interesting article on a previous topic | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jim Conforti (lndshrk![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:50:20 -0700 (PDT) |
At 11:34 AM 5/26/2009, you wrote:
I don't think I would feel comfortable buying a product with any long-term committment associated with it understanding that the company who sold it to me was Bankrupt, had no operating capital, and was unable to service/support their product.....you can't tell me Bankrupcy has zero-impact on car sales.
And?The Bankruptcies OCCURED (and WILL occur) with or without "Government intervention"
Did the government "bail out" Chrysler? YES - with BILLIONS of our tax dollars.
BILLIONS as in multiples of 1,000,000,000 or 1E9 dollars for the engineers/scientists.
A stack of ONE DOLLAR BILLS 60+ miles HIGH is a billion dollars. Are they in Ch 11 as we speak? YES Did the "bail out" work? NOWhat did the "bail out" do? Transfer wealth from bond/stockholders and the taxpayers
into the hands of the UAW. Nothing more, nothing less. JC
- Re: Interesting article on a previous topic, (continued)
-
Re: Interesting article on a previous topic Michael James, May 26 2009
-
Re: Interesting article on a previous topic Jim Conforti, May 26 2009
- Re: Interesting article on a previous topic Brian E. Buxton, May 26 2009
-
Re: Interesting article on a previous topic Jim Conforti, May 26 2009
-
Re: Interesting article on a previous topic Michael James, May 26 2009
- Re: Interesting article on a previous topic Jim Conforti, May 26 2009
- Re: Interesting article on a previous topic Rick, May 26 2009
-
Re: Interesting article on a previous topic Michael James, May 26 2009
- Re: Interesting article on a previous topic Rick Lindsay, May 26 2009
- Re: Interesting article on a previous topic Barry W Raborn, May 26 2009
- Fw: Interesting article on a previous topic jimshadow, May 26 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.