Re: Ferrari math | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: John Ashburne (jashburne![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 04:44:58 -0700 (PDT) |
Rick I think your math is tight. Go for it! John Sent from my ATT Bell Rotary Dial Phone > On Jun 26, 2014, at 7:20 AM, Rick Lindsay <richardolindsay [at] gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hey Gang, > > As I consider adding another carburetted Ferrari to my scuderia, I find > myself considering the mathematics of the situation - with a startling > realization. I ask myself; Are two carburetted cars twice the trouble, or is > the trouble exponential?! Here's the rationalization: > > Using the Clyde lexicon, > > If linear, then: 1 s#!tbox + 1 s#!tbox = 2 s#!tboxes > > However, > > If exponential, then: 1 s#!tbox ^ 2 = 1 s#!tbox > > So math and logic dictate that owning two carburetted cars have a Clyde > s#!tbox rating no greater than owning just one! Bonus! I am convinced! > > -rick > PS: Thanks Clyde for NEVER sugar-coating your opinion. Right or wrong, > honesty is refreshing. > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/jashburne%40aol.com > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/
-
Ferrari math Rick Lindsay, June 26 2014
- Re: Ferrari math John Ashburne, June 26 2014
- Re: Ferrari math Charles Perry, June 26 2014
- Re: Ferrari math Clyde Romero, June 26 2014
- Re: Ferrari math Grahame Reinthal, June 26 2014
- Re: Ferrari math Doug & Terri, June 26 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.