Re: 1989 348 Sales Price | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Peter Rychel (dino308gt4![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 00:24:20 -0700 (PDT) |
Lets compare apples-to-apples here. A 512TR MAY be better performance-wise, but we’re not talking about the same type of model. The V-8 series was always meant to be the entry-level example, whereas the 12s were always the top-of-the-line model. The 12s will always out-perform an 8 when relatively-close in age/era. That’s the point. Get them in with an 8, then in a few years they’ll trade up to a 12 (or, at least a newer 8). Funny you mention the 355, because that is a car I would never touch! As much as the 355 was a vast improvement over the 348, they were cursed with some major problems too. Don’t forget that first gen. F1 transmission was cool at the time, but is garbage today (I wouldn’t be surprised if some of those parts are NLA). Have the exhaust manifold and valve guide issues been truly solved to this day? Am I correct to think that even aftermarket Tubi manifolds still crack, just because of the insane levels of heat generated by the engines? Cats that crap out O2 sensors, constantly triggering CELs, etc. But one thing the 355 has going for it is a glorious exhaust note that, in my opinion (take it for what it’s worth! Ha!) has THE best sound that has never been surpassed. Peter Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Ferrari <ferrari-bounces+dino308gt4=hotmail.com [at] ferrarilist.com> on behalf of clyderomerof4 [at] gmail.com <clyderomerof4 [at] gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 8:16:11 AM To: PeterGT4 Cc: The FerrariList Subject: Re: [Ferrari] 1989 348 Sales Price You have obviously never driven a 512 TR I could eat a 348 and a 355 alive with my car
Out brake it and definitely out accelerate it
On any given day
You have a soft spot for the 348 Lash
I get that
But facts are facts
The car was a stone in a swimming pool
At the bottom!
If you have no enemies, you have no character !
Clyde Romero
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail ( including attachments ) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 2510-2521, and is intended only for the persons or entity
to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is prohibited.
This email transmission, and any documents, files or previous email messages attached to it, may contain confidential information that is priviledged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a
person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the information containes in or attached to this message is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission
in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail at
Clyde.romerof4 [at] gmail.com or by telephone at (678 6419932)and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading them or saving them to disk.
|
- Re: 1989 348 Sales Price, (continued)
- Re: 1989 348 Sales Price clyderomerof4, October 5 2018
- Re: 1989 348 Sales Price Lashdeep Singh, October 5 2018
- Re: 1989 348 Sales Price Clarence Romero Jr., October 5 2018
- Re: 1989 348 Sales Price Lashdeep Singh, October 5 2018
- Re: 1989 348 Sales Price Peter Rychel, October 6 2018
- Re: 1989 348 Sales Price Lashdeep Singh, October 7 2018
- Re: 1989 348 Sales Price Peter Rychel, October 5 2018
- Re: 1989 348 Sales Price Erik Nielsen, October 6 2018
- Re: 1989 348 Sales Price clyderomerof4, October 6 2018
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.