Re: Ferrari Track Events | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lashdeep Singh (lashdeep![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 13:34:39 -0800 (PST) |
There a myriad of reasons for the downward trend in attendance of track and concours type events. Increasing costs are definitely one. Insurance, as Charles explains, but also entry fees and associated charges have skyrocketed. Also, people are just getting more lazy. Our winter karting league is all but dead because a lot of the racers are opting to run iRacing online from home. Why drive through the snow for an hour when you can compete in your pajamas? As we know, attention spans are contracting more and more. People are more reluctant to commit to a weekend long event when a quick dash to a car show and a few selfies on Snap or Insta can be accomplished in 90 mins. > On Mar 5, 2019, at 14:15, Charles Perry <charles [at] carolinasound.com> > wrote: > > Interesting. Sadly, a tremendous amount of what happens here is based on > liability issues since we have the most litigious society ever. Currently a > case is winding through our courts in California where a motorcycle rider at > a track day overdrove his ability, went off track, hit a sand bag that was > there to keep drainage water from washing silt/debris onto the track, and > busted himself up in the resulting crash. The lawyers, claiming that no > warning about the bag off-track constituted gross negligence (to negate the > waivers the "victim" signed), initially filed against the event organizer, > the track management, the track owner, and against Mazda Motors because they > had purchased naming rights to the track (but had zero other involvement - > just potentially deep pockets). The personal injury attorneys seem to drive > 90% of what happens here now, including the warning stickers telling you that > your toaster oven is unsuitable for bathtub use. I believe the case against > Mazda was thrown out, but the other facets of that case may have far reaching > consequences for our hobby. > > Here that also drives a lot of things for instructors. Many groups don't > allow them to drive student cars. Most groups require equal safety equipment > for instructor and driver (meaning you can't have a race seat and 6-point > harnesses for the driver and a stock seat with 3-point belt for the > passenger). Insurance on your car is optional, but since our street policies > typically won't even cover "driving education" while on track, it's a good > idea if you can't afford to write off your car. For my Corvette, it adds > about $400 / event, which usually equals or exceeds the event cost. Sometimes > passengers can have rides, sometimes not. It's all over the map based on the > various insurances in place by the track and the event organizer. > > I enjoy it a lot, but it is an expensive hobby and is poised to here to get > more expensive over time. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: francis newman [mailto:francis.newman [at] webshot.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2019 12:55 PM > To: Charles Perry > Cc: francis newman; The FerrariList > Subject: Re: Ferrari Track Events > > Hi again Charles > > Here in the UK we don’t require a vehicle check, other than for noise (which > the circuit do). We used to check they had the right fire extinguishers (that > was my job) but no longer. Only thing left we check is that they have a tow > hook attached. There is no requir ment for insurance, in fact I have always > taken mine on track uninsured mainly becuase my inusrer didnlt offer that > although my new insurer offers cover at 80 dollars per event. > > Until last year our track days were Ferrari only though last year we > experimented with allowing other cars (FOC owners) to try and increase > attendance which sort of worked but with not a particuarly big uptaake though > we did have a Lola race car which was impressive. > > You are right about the added costs, though distances here in UK are much > less. The tracks I have been on are all within a 2 hour drive. That is not > teh same for all though. But even for an old car like mine there is still a > tyre cost. > > The other problem is that we always had really good instructors, all of them > club members, all qualified instructors and most of them long term racers, > who were volunteers and they came free. I had some really good instruction. > But new insurance regulations from national Motor Sports Association mean > they aren't allowed to drive the cars, which was the big motivation for them > to get behind the wheel of the latest car for a couple of laps. So they lost > interest and that came to an end. > > So - I have one month to decide whether or not to take my car on track again > at Silverstone, with no instructor to help keep an eye on what is coming up > behind at a rate of knots (though I am pretty good at that myself). Sadly I > suspect that I won't take part, but then…..maybe?. > > Best > > Francis > >> On 5 Mar 2019, at 04:21, Charles Perry <charles [at] carolinasound.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Francis! As I'm sure you're aware, the States cover a huge geographic >> area, so each region has their own management within the Ferrari Club of >> America (FCA). Some regions are definitely more polished than others. The >> North Carolina region, for example, does an annual track event at Virginia >> International Raceway (VIR) that is outstanding - low key, well organized, >> reasonably priced and with a great instructor pool. My favorite event of the >> year. So it varies a lot by region. >> >> Amusingly, it was the FCA that drove me to buy a Corvette for my track >> events. I had been using my F355 spider, but one year they changed the >> insurance rules at VIR with little notice, so during Tech Inspection for the >> event they told me I had to move from the Intermediate group to the Novice >> group because my car was a convertible. Then they declared there would be NO >> passing for ANYONE in the Novice group because my convertible had no roll >> hoops. Needless to say, I was not very popular at that event, and I was >> frustrated because I could've brought a different car if I'd had one day of >> notice. >> >> So I decided to sell the 355 and buy the Corvette since I want to do a lot >> more track events. The Corvette is WAY cheaper to buy, WAY cheaper to run >> and WAY cheaper to fix than a Ferrari. It has performance on par with a 488, >> although certainly without the finesse and balance of the 488. >> >> Track events are generally a lot more expensive than just the track fee. You >> have the hotels, the pre-event inspection, the more frequent fluid changes, >> more frequent tire and brake changes, specialty track insurance. If you get >> serious, safety equipment, maybe a trailer, extra sets of tires/wheels, >> truck to pull the trailer, etc. So it can get out of hand in a hurry. It >> sounds like maybe you guys have some of the issues of older cars here - the >> people that can afford those cars can often JUST afford the cars (like when >> I bought my TR), and so extras are out of budget when you stretched to get >> the car in the first place. Most of the people I see at Ferrari track events >> are the people who can afford to write off a car (either classic or new) if >> there's a crash or something. For most of us financial mortals, if you >> really think that might happen to you, you'd buy an $8,000 Miata or Boxster, >> and if you crash it, you spent less on the whole car than an F355 quarter >> panel would cost before paint. >> >> So I'm guessing that's a lot of it. As the prices for everything continue to >> rise, the incremental joy of tracking a Ferrari versus tracking something >> more pedestrian is low, and if you have a pristine car, you'd rather keep it >> that way. >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: francis newman [mailto:francis.newman [at] webshot.co.uk] >> Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2019 2:49 PM >> To: Charles Perry >> Cc: francis newman; The FerrariList >> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Idiots with money >> >> Hi Charles >> >> I feel for you. Luckily here in the UK the FOC have a team who have been >> working togather at track days for years. I am one of that team and have >> helped at something like 80 track days over the last 20 years. Our team >> controls everything other than the on track marshalling and I like to think >> we have it down to a fine art. >> >> The only proiblem is that owners no longer seem to want to take their cars >> on track. 8 or so years ago the FOC ran 6 trackdays per year including two >> on the full Silverstone Grandprix circuit with 130 cars and a waiting list. >> This year we are down to 2, a shorter Silverstone circuit (cheaper) and >> Goodwood. We are at a loss to understand the lack of demand. The Silverstone >> day is 400 dollars and the Goodwood one is 525 dollars. Goodwood will sell >> out as there are limited numbers but Silverstone won’t. >> >> I have taken my car on track at Silverstone 5 or 6 times. We previously had >> different level sessions but now have an open pitlane. Can occasionally be >> daunting with GT cars going past 40-50 mph faster, but I have never had a >> real problem. >> >> But all the older cars (and by that I mean 355s and earlier) have >> disappeared. Even just 5 years ago there would be a good number of >> everything from the early 70s onwards. Now I seem to be alone. No-one seems >> to know why. Sure, the value of the earlier cars went up a bit but is that >> really the reason? >> >> Would be interested in comments. >> >> Francis >> >>> On 3 Mar 2019, at 18:14, Charles Perry <charles [at] carolinasound.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Mine is the black C7 Z06 Corvette in the first picture with the IMSA car. >>> >>> I hesitate to criticize events since I know how hard it is to get people to >>> help and execute in the way you (as an organizer) want, but I was surprised >>> that this wasn’t better given how big the Florida chapter of the FCA must >>> be. I’m guessing aside from CA they probably have the highest owner density >>> of any state. Part of the fault lay with the FCA. They had 110+ cars signed >>> up but only had two lanes open for tech inspection and 45 minutes total >>> allotted. No way that was going to happen. So eventually they just said >>> “Everyone leave your car where it sits and come to the driver’s meeting and >>> we’ll keep inspecting while you meet.” I think they assigned instructors to >>> the beginners, but there was no information on who instructors were or >>> where to find them if you wanted one for intermediate or advanced. There >>> was no central location to find an organizer, so with two massive garages >>> and the driver’s meeting area the people who were in charge were >>> immediately invisible after the driver’s meeting. They didn’t use the PA >>> for the morning to announce run groups, so it was a little chaotic with >>> when people showed up at pit out since they started late/off-schedule from >>> the driver’s meeting. >>> >>> At one point an intermediate car stopped on track with mechanical issues, >>> so they black flagged the session. Apparently about 20% of drivers missed >>> the flags for up to 3 more laps, so then they called everyone into the >>> driver’s meeting room again to address that. After that meeting they >>> decided to combine the beginner’s group and the intermediate group. Their >>> intent was good (trying to give back some of the track time that was lost >>> to the black flagged session and subsequent meeting), but in practice all >>> it did was badly exacerbate the problem of the whole session becoming a >>> slow train through the road course (like I was literally coasting off >>> throttle for the majority of the infield). That was when I asked to move to >>> Advanced, which thankfully the Chief Instructor accommodated. After that it >>> was a lot more fun. Part of this fault was also with the Daytona track >>> crew. They were waving cars from pit-out onto the track as quickly as they >>> could, rather than spacing the release to spread out the field. That was a >>> big track, so there was ample room to space people instead of bunching them >>> from the first turn on. >>> >>> So a lot of room for improvement, but I enjoyed the afternoon with the >>> faster group. It had rained the whole night before and the track was pretty >>> wet in the morning, so I was running street tires. It dried in the >>> afternoon and got warmer, so I could’ve switched to my Cup tires and gone a >>> little faster, but since it was my first time at that track I was just >>> happy to concentrate on my line. The Forza 6/Xbox simulator that I had >>> practiced on in the days leading up to it was remarkably accurate, but some >>> of the landmarks I used to learn turn-in or braking points in the simulator >>> (the Ferris Wheel and some signs on the banking) weren’t there or were in >>> different places in real life, so I had to unlearn what was in my head from >>> the game to mark new spots on the track. >>> >>> It was expensive for a one-day event ($700, I think?), but as I said >>> before, FCA will be expensive, and it included a nice lunch. Plus I’m sure >>> Daytona is a far more expensive track to rent than most I’ve been on. >>> >>> I’d like to do it again next year, but I’d definitely sign up for advanced >>> from what I learned this year and where I hope to be next year. >>> >>> >>> <image001.jpg> >>> >>> From: Lashdeep Singh <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> >>> Sent: Sunday, March 3, 2019 5:11 AM >>> To: Charles Perry <charles [at] carolinasound.com> >>> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> >>> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Idiots with money >>> >>> CG, you forgot to mention what you were driving while on track. >>> >>> What was your impression of how that event was run and the costs? >>> >>> On Mar 3, 2019, at 04:11, Charles Perry <charles [at] carolinasound.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> lol. I don’t do much with the FCA since the vast majority of their events >>> are heinously expensive. However, a few weeks ago I did their track event >>> at Daytona International Speedway since I wanted to try that track. There >>> was a scattering of interesting cars from a variety of marques, but the >>> vast majority of attendees were 458/488 chassis. I signed up for the >>> intermediate group since I am realistically low- to mid-intermediate with >>> most groups I run with. >>> >>> This lot was hilarious though. There were probably 40-50 cars in the >>> intermediate group, and of those, maybe 6 had any concept of the racing >>> line. It was quite clear that most of them were just slogging through the >>> infield road course section as a necessary evil to be able to hammer it on >>> the banked oval sections. It was literally a 30mph poser parade through >>> anything with a turn included. >>> >>> After lunch I found the Chief Instructor and asked if I could run with the >>> advanced group for a session or two. At most events, those guys would >>> consider me a chicane, but this time I was only passed by three cars – a >>> seriously quick Corvette C7 Grand Sport, an F12 and an IMSA prototype. >>> Pretty sure after the event, all of the intermediate guys drove to the >>> local hot spot and assumed two parking spots each. J >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Ferrari [mailto:ferrari-bounces+charles=carolinasound.com [at] >>> ferrarilist.com] On Behalf Of Rick Moseley >>> Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2019 6:19 PM >>> To: Charles Perry >>> Cc: The FerrariList >>> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Idiots with money >>> >>> Bingo!! The last sentence says it all for me. >>> There are those who buy cars for the way the cars make them feel when they >>> are alone behind the wheel. Many of those people are my friends (plenty >>> here) >>> >>> Then >>> >>> There are those who buy cars for the way they think the cars make them look >>> in public. I tend not to gravitate their way. >>> >>> I'd rather spend a whole Saturday in Rob Garven's garage than 2 minutes >>> with the dork that just bought a 488, showed up at the local hot spot and >>> took two parking spots by the front door. >>> >>> >>> On Saturday, March 2, 2019, 3:03:34 PM PST, Clarence Romero Jr. >>> <clyderomerof4 [at] gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Not like the dolts who buy the cars for the wrong reason >>> >>> <IMG_0207.jpg> >>> <IMG_0208.jpg> >>> <IMG_0215.jpg> >>> _________________________________________________________________ >>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: >>> https://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/lashdeep%40yahoo.com >>> >>> Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com >>> and F1 Headlines >>> http://www.F1Headlines.com/ >>> _________________________________________________________________ >>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: >>> https://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/francis.newman%40fntn.co.uk >>> >>> Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com >>> and F1 Headlines >>> http://www.F1Headlines.com/ >> > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/lashdeep%40yahoo.com > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/
- Re: Ferrari Track Events, (continued)
- Re: Ferrari Track Events Hans E. Hansen, March 5 2019
- Re: Ferrari Track Events Brian Keegan, March 5 2019
- Re: Ferrari Track Events Erik Nielsen, March 5 2019
- Re: Ferrari Track Events Brian Keegan, March 5 2019
- Re: Ferrari Track Events Lashdeep Singh, March 8 2019
- Re: Ferrari Track Events Erik Nielsen, March 9 2019
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.