Re: Wonderful Car List | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Peter Rychel (dino308gt4![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 21:54:38 -0700 (PDT) |
But in a way, was/is that influenced by the insurance companies who figure that sports cars are for “reckless-macho-men” and 2+2s fall under the “emasculated-wimpy-family-man-who-doesn’t-take-risks-therefore-we-don’t-have-to-pay-out-high-dollar-claims-because-he-won’t-crash-it(-as-much)” category? Peter Sent from Mail for Windows From: Rick Moseley Exactly. I think the last time I was in Monterey was maybe 2014. I said the exact thing to a Ferrari exec at lunch in the tent. He said they never intended for the seats to be used… but in the US market they got a huge tax break by
being able to categorize it as a 2+2. By putting child car seat anchors in the back seats they got nearly $500 per car in incentive money and the cost per car was only about $5. I joked that if one were to actually break one of those brackets, Ferrari cost
to the owner would probably be close to $200…. To which he smugly replied “possibly more”. I guess those seats fall under those idiot regulations like the one that made Toyota turn the 4-Runner into a 4 door.
_________________________________________________________________ |
- Re: Wonderful Car List, (continued)
- Re: Wonderful Car List scott saidel, September 9 2021
- Re: Wonderful Car List LSJ, September 9 2021
- Re: Wonderful Car List Erik Nielsen, September 9 2021
- Re: Wonderful Car List Rick Moseley, September 8 2021
- Re: Wonderful Car List Peter Rychel, September 8 2021
- Re: Wonderful Car List Rick Moseley, September 8 2021
- Re: Wonderful Car List Matt Boyd, September 9 2021
- Re: Wonderful Car List LSJ, September 9 2021
- Re: Wonderful Car List Matt Boyd, September 9 2021
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.