Re: Too good to be true? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Anthony Bauco (tbauco![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 10:37:02 -0700 (PDT) |
Exactly. For higher priced 456s I have seen cars with major interior flaws and issues with the active suspension. This seems way better at a crazy price point. If is clears a good PPI, that is a great deal. Not sure I like black, however.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021, 10:45 AM Rick Moseley <ramosel [at] pacbell.net> wrote:
Certainly "looks" as though it's been taken care of.On Wednesday, September 22, 2021, 07:37:13 AM PDT, Anthony Bauco <tbauco [at] gmail.com> wrote:_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/ramosel%40pacbell.net
Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/
-
Too good to be true? Anthony Bauco, September 22 2021
-
Re: Too good to be true? Rick Moseley, September 22 2021
- Re: Too good to be true? Anthony Bauco, September 22 2021
- Re: Too good to be true? Gary Reed, September 22 2021
- Re: Too good to be true? Erik Nielsen, September 22 2021
- Re: Too good to be true? Anthony Bauco, September 22 2021
- Re: Too good to be true? Matt Boyd, September 22 2021
-
Re: Too good to be true? Rick Moseley, September 22 2021
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.