Re: Rare by Design - Superfast vs. 5000GT | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Peter Rychel (dino308gt4![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 22:58:10 -0700 (PDT) |
Thanks for your perspective. Despite the fact it was the biggest Ferrari made (up to that time), I’m not surprised at your comments that the driving dynamics were quite the opposite. Nice. No issues with the self-leveling suspension? I’ve got the repair manual for it and I find it amusing because it’s not that different – in concept – from the self-leveling systems used in commercial vehicles! In the Ferrari’s case, it’s hydraulic. For commercial vehicles, it’s air. The load-leveling valve, which is the key part of the system, works in the same manner! I always preferred the looks of the mags to wires. I like the look of both, the Cromodora wheels (#1 choice) and the Campagnolos (#2). Peter Sent from Mail for Windows From: Lashdeep Singh The QM was awesome fun. It felt smaller and lighter than it was. The back seat was real and usable. Engine sounded incredible and never gave any issues over the years I owned mine. The exhaust system hangs low on those and there is a lot of it so you have to be careful. The factory mags were much better driving than the Borranis so would recommend getting both. Wires for show, Mg for go!
|
- Re: Rare by Design - Superfast vs. 5000GT, (continued)
- Re: Rare by Design - Superfast vs. 5000GT Brian Keegan, October 9 2021
- Re: Rare by Design - Superfast vs. 5000GT Lashdeep Singh, October 11 2021
- Re: Rare by Design - Superfast vs. 5000GT Brian Keegan, October 11 2021
- Re: Rare by Design - Superfast vs. 5000GT Lashdeep Singh, October 8 2021
- Re: Rare by Design - Superfast vs. 5000GT Peter Rychel, October 8 2021
- Re: Rare by Design - Superfast vs. 5000GT Lashdeep Singh, October 11 2021
- Re: Rare by Design - Superfast vs. 5000GT Peter Rychel, October 11 2021
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.