Ferrari Mailing List: Re: That will buff out

[Rick Moseley (ramosel]

Again, your view.  I was leaning didactic in the neutral.  But that requires participation and I guess that was too much to ask?

On Feb 14, 2022, at 04:58, Anthony Bauco <tbauco [at] gmail.com> wrote:



You are being pedantic now.  A supposition requires some data.  That is the only difference.  What data do you have on this specific incident?  If you are extrapolating past data to a current incident, it is an assumption.  The only question is, why make that assumption?

On Sun, Feb 13, 2022, 7:07 PM Rick Moseley <ramosel [at] pacbell.net> wrote:

You know wrong.  I do not see that. That is your view.  I view it as a supposition 

On Feb 13, 2022, at 13:08, Anthony Bauco <tbauco [at] gmail.com> wrote:



I'm not defending anyone because I don't know the facts.  Your assumption based on past experience could be right.  But it IS an assumption.  I know you see that.  

On Sun, Feb 13, 2022, 12:47 PM Rick Moseley <ramosel [at] pacbell.net> wrote:

I don’t see any judgment being passed.  But, I don’t use emotion or feelings as my yardstick for thought or conversation.  

It would be like me accusing your profession of being way too defensive or overly sensitive or fostering super Karenism.  “I” have no basis other than your statements to make that generalization, so I won’t.  

However, most of us have seen abject stupidity committed by Ferrari owners… over and over.  Been around long enough and you’ve probably witnessed it in person.  Keegan can back me up on that when a bozo in front of his old work over drove his 360 into a parked historic Drag Racer that was worth more than the 360.  Fortunately, I have not had to witness a death from these stupidities… yet. 

There isn’t much much of that in flying (at extreme levels) as it is ingrained in you from the beginning that it A) won’t be tolerated, B) will kill you with absolutely no inhibitions, emotion or remorse and C) could result in the death of those with you (my most considered factor).     

So, if it makes you “feel” better, by all means, defend these drivers.  In the long term betting odds favor lucky.  

On Feb 13, 2022, at 6:33 AM, Anthony Bauco <tbauco [at] gmail.com> wrote:



I don't.  That's why I didn't comment on his driving skills.  Maybe it is a pilot thing but you guys seem to like to pass judgment and joke about people dieing or nearly dieing.  Maybe it was how you guys convinced yourselves it wouldn't happen to you.  Maybe you guys were the lucky ones and it wasn't just skill.  The opportunity here is to look back with gratitude.  Just saying.  

On Sun, Feb 13, 2022, 12:45 AM Rick Moseley <ramosel [at] pacbell.net> wrote:

How do you know he wasn’t lucky?

On Feb 12, 2022, at 16:00, Anthony Bauco <tbauco [at] gmail.com> wrote:



Do we know he was bad?  Maybe an animal ran out in front of him.  Or maybe an oncoming driver crossed the yellow lines.  Maybe they were even drunk.  Maybe the guy had a medical emergency.  

On Sat, Feb 12, 2022, 1:07 PM Rick Moseley <ramosel [at] pacbell.net> wrote:

Yet another “better lucky than good”.

On Feb 12, 2022, at 07:31, BRITT ROTHMAN via Ferrari <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> wrote:

The driver survived apparently






Sent from my iPhone_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/ramosel%40pacbell.net

Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/tbauco%40gmail.com

Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/