Re: Lift Questions (long) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: LS (lashdeep![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:54:46 -0800 (PST) |
I usually end up working on the car below the first lock...I just work quickly and without any additional strain when I have the lift in that position. I did notice that last night, the lift does take a while to lower and raise. But, I think it's something to just get used to. I did get a chance to use a Nussbaum-2 and it was very quick. It hustled a Lambo LM002 (aka Orca) up to full height quickly and without any strain. They are expensive though. LS --- Jeff Greenfield <coyote [at] acme-ltd.com> wrote: > < The only minor complaint I have about the Bendpak-2 is that there is a > big > gap between the lowest setting and the first lock. I've found myself > sometimes wanting a position where access to the car from underhood and > undercarriage was needed simultaneously.> > > Yes, the locks on the bendpak don't start until about 2 feet up or so. > But > in a year and a half of using this lift to service cars everyday > (remember, > this is what I do, so it is not used on an occasional weekend), I have > not > found this to be a problem. > > One of my complaints, is that the lift is kind of slow to come down, > especially with a lightweight car on it. > > Other than that, I'm pretty happy with it. So far, I have not run into > anything that I could not lift, although on a few occasions I've had to > get > creative with some blocks of wood on the lift arms as the pads did not > end > up where they needed to be. > > Jeff > > -----Original Message----- > From: LS [mailto:lashdeep [at] yahoo.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2006 9:54 AM > To: Jeff Greenfield > Cc: 'The FerrariList' > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Lift Questions (long) > > CG, Greg Weldy has a Assymetrical 2 post Bendpak and he's been very > happy > with it. I assisted with the install and it was fairly straightforward. > Lifting those columns up was a welcomed workout, but tricky! The only > minor complaint I have about the Bendpak-2 is that there is a big gap > between the lowest setting and the first lock. I've found myself > sometimes > wanting a position where access to the car from underhood and > undercarriage was needed simultaneously. > > Not considering cars with removeable subframes, a 4 post-er sure has had > my vote recently. I used a Rotary-4 to do some suspension work recently > and it was painless and very stable (of course). It also allows for > doing > suspension setup or anything else where a loaded suspension is > necessary. > > Each has their pros (as Jeff has pointed out below)and cons. I'd get > both, > keep us posted! > > LS > --- Jeff Greenfield <coyote [at] acme-ltd.com> wrote: > > > Lots of options and opinions, I'm sure that you'll get many different > > answers depending on who you talk too. > > > > I've worked with both styles of lifts, and spent a lot of time > > researching > > lifts, and deciding what to get for my shop before actually buying > one. > > > > Asymmetrical is far more convenient in that is makes it much easier to > > get > > in and out of the car as you can open generally open the door of the > car > > further (sometimes all the way depending the car) then you can with a > > symmetrical lift. > > > > Asymmetrical is great for FWD, and most front engine RWD cars. I > haven't > > had > > any problems putting everything from an Alfa spider, 308, or BMW 750iL > > on my > > lift. Which is for all intents and purposes an asymmetrical lift. > > > > That being said, many lifts now, have extra long front arms (sometimes > > an > > option, sometimes not) which allow the lift to be used in either > > configuration assuming the length of the bay is long enough to allow > the > > car > > to be positioned further to the front or back of the lift depending on > > what > > you want to do. > > > > The most important thing is to use common sense, pick the car up a > foot > > or > > so, and do the 'bounce' test my pushing/jumping on the ends of the car > > to be > > sure it is stable. > > > > Rotary lifts are really nice, and if money is no object by all means > go > > ahead and get one. There are plenty of others out there that every bit > > as > > good for about half as much. > > > > Mine is a Bendpak, which I bought online (www.asedeals.com) for > > substantially less than any 'dealers' could offer it for, and > installed > > it > > myself with the help of one other person. The bendpak does have > long(er) > > front arms and I believe is considered both symmetrical and > asymmetrical > > but > > I'd have to look at the brochure to be sure. > > > > Depending on the space, whether or not is new construction or not, and > > budget (the latter being the determining factor) there some other > pretty > > neat options out there. > > > > Twin post in ground would be my first choice for a new floor if money > > were > > no object. Another option would be full-height scissor lift (google > > Nussbaum > > lifts out of germany), however this does have some limitations has to > > under > > car access. The advantage of both these styles is that there is pretty > > much > > clear floor space. Those two columns really take up a lot of a floor > > space. > > > > OTH, you can't beat an above ground two post for all around > versatility > > and > > price. Also, there is a big variation among the above ground lifts for > > width > > spacing of the columns, if space is of a concern (as it was in my > shop) > > then > > this is also a big consideration. A lot of lifts are now designed to > > have > > the capability to pick up large trucks and SUV's. So, if you're never > > going > > to work on those, than it is wasted space. > > > > LMK if you have any questions, BTDTGTTS. > > > > I'll try to send along a photo or two of my shop this week, after I > get > > back > > home. > > > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Charles G. Perry IV [mailto:charles [at] carolina-sound.com] > > Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 9:44 PM > > To: Jeff Greenfield > > Cc: The FerrariList > > Subject: [Ferrari] Lift Questions > > > > To those of you who know or may have researched lifts: > > > > I am considering a Rotary two-post lift for a future property. They > have > > two > > basic designs, symmetrical and asymmetrical. They list their > advantages > > as > > follows: > > > > Asymmetrical: > > -- Places center of gravity of vehicle in line with columns optimal > load > > capacity > > -- Allows maximum opening of door for interior access > > > > Symmetrical: > > -- Vehicle load is centered between posts to maximize lift capacity > > -- More width between columns for larger vehicles > > > > Which lift is more appropriate to working on mid-engine cars in > general, > > and > > specifically Ferraris where the rear subframe must come out for engine > > maintenance (TR/355/??). Considering it's hard to predict future > > purchases, > > are there any other things you would recommend thinking about when > > shopping > > for a lift or choosing a design? > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- charles > > > > > === message truncated === www.exhaust.tv ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $310k for $999/mo. Calculate new payment! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre
- Re: Lift Questions (long), (continued)
-
Re: Lift Questions (long) Jeff Greenfield, November 25 2006
-
Re: Lift Questions (long) LS, November 26 2006
- Re: Lift Questions (long) Ken Rentiers, November 26 2006
- Re: Lift Questions (long) Jeff Greenfield, November 26 2006
- Re: Lift Questions (long) LS, November 26 2006
-
Re: Lift Questions (long) LS, November 26 2006
- Re: Lift Questions (long) misc, November 26 2006
- Re: Lift Questions (long) Brian E. Buxton, November 26 2006
- Re: Lift Questions (long) misc, November 26 2006
- Re: Lift Questions (long) Brian E. Buxton, November 26 2006
-
Re: Lift Questions (long) Jeff Greenfield, November 25 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.