Re: WAY OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Steve Jenkins (steve![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 21:20:38 -0800 (PST) |
Party foul! You can't "but I digress!" I b.i.d.'ed first! :) Your "last sentence above" was: <Believe it or not I have heard that there are people who actually do that.> Your "first sentence above" was: <Actually I was working all day at my "supposed" business, AND still trying to figure out how to make money on soda machines.> Neither of which were the sentences you probably intended. I'm done with this thread. It's no fun verbally sparring with someone in a lower weight class. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Brian E. Buxton [mailto:BrianBuxton [at] BuxtonMotorsports.com] Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 9:08 PM To: Steve Jenkins Cc: ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com Subject: Re: [Ferrari] WAY OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Steve Jenkins wrote: ><<1) You've been sitting there all day thinking "Damn - how the hell am I >going to reply to THAT?" and riding the coat-tails of someone else's reply >to a completely different discussion is the best you came up with?>> > > Actually I was working all day at my "supposed" business, AND still trying to figure out how to make money on soda machines. Still stumped on that one. But I digress ... since I wasn't directing my original e-mail to you personally I didn't think a personal reply was necessary. It's not my job to police the opinions posted to the list. Just to read and consider them. Whether I agree or disagree can be kept to myself. I don't feel it necessary to post every action I take, every time I change the oil in my car or the temp in my hot tub on the internet. Believe it or not I have heard that there are people who actually do that. ><<2) If you really must know, I will simply say that the "bautiful" blonde >was... um.... "busy" as I typed my reply. :) We're newlyweds, but we're >still both computer geeks (we both took our Macs on our honeymoon - the >video editing on those things is awesome... but I digress). We keep our Macs >on the floor on our respective sides of the bed, and the wireless network >reaches the bedroom just fine. If Erin gets done surfing her news and gossip >sites in the evening before I'm done reading email and Slashdot, she has no >problem coming up with methods to re-focus my attention. And yes, I asked >her permission to share that before I typed it.>> > > Refer to my last sentence above. ><<3) What precisely was "off" about my reply? My inbox is full of private >replies confirming that it was dead on.>> > > Refer to my first sentence above. BEB
- Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking, (continued)
-
Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking BRIGANDBAR, December 4 2006
-
Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Brian E. Buxton, December 4 2006
- Re: WAY OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Steve Jenkins, December 4 2006
- Re: WAY OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Brian E. Buxton, December 4 2006
- Re: WAY OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Steve Jenkins, December 4 2006
- Re: WAY OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Peter Pless, December 4 2006
- Re: WAY OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Brian E. Buxton, December 4 2006
- Re: WAY OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Brian E. Buxton, December 4 2006
-
Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Brian E. Buxton, December 4 2006
-
Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking BRIGANDBAR, December 4 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.