Re: WAY OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Steve Jenkins (steve![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 20:36:48 -0800 (PST) |
1) You've been sitting there all day thinking "Damn - how the hell am I going to reply to THAT?" and riding the coat-tails of someone else's reply to a completely different discussion is the best you came up with? 2) If you really must know, I will simply say that the "bautiful" blonde was... um.... "busy" as I typed my reply. :) We're newlyweds, but we're still both computer geeks (we both took our Macs on our honeymoon - the video editing on those things is awesome... but I digress). We keep our Macs on the floor on our respective sides of the bed, and the wireless network reaches the bedroom just fine. If Erin gets done surfing her news and gossip sites in the evening before I'm done reading email and Slashdot, she has no problem coming up with methods to re-focus my attention. And yes, I asked her permission to share that before I typed it. 3) What precisely was "off" about my reply? My inbox is full of private replies confirming that it was dead on. SteveJ -----Original Message----- From: Brian E. Buxton [mailto:BrianBuxton [at] BuxtonMotorsports.com] Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 4:05 PM To: Steve Jenkins Cc: ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com Subject: Re: [Ferrari] OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Dr. S, I think it must be something in the water or the air, because both recent posts from Steve J and Dennis were a little "off" in my opinion. I would say that you paid your dues, so just sit back and enjoy the fact that anyone can spout off about pretty much anything, in ENGLISH no less, because of your contributions. I know that Dennis has been married for a while so it makes a little more sense (??), but if I were Steve J and was recently married to a bautiful blonde, the last thing I'd be doing at 10pm was typing some huge ranting e-mail about a water cooler topic. There has to be a better way to relieve stress than all of the recent insults and insinuations ... Brian BRIGANDBAR [at] aol.com wrote: >Dennis: > >I have to say that since the days that I worked as a student in Barry >Goldwater's campaign, through the time that I slugged through the jungles of >Vietnam, to years of work in counter-terrorism no one has ever called me a >"Communist". Fascist once or twice, but never a Communist. I am sure you earned the >right to do that by fighting in either the jungles with me, or in Somalia and >a few other places, or in the desert country of the Middle East, or some >other diligent service to the country either first in the Cold War or >subsequently in the Middle East or in our struggle against terrorism and terrorist >attacks upon U. S. interests. Maybe you will enlighten us on how and when you >earned the right to attach that label on anyone. I know all about free speech, >but there is also the responsibility to temper that right with sound judgement >lest you become all that you seem to oppose. > >Frankly, I don't give a damn if the U.S. government runs the Postal Service. >I just hate special interest contractors who profit at taxpayer's expense. >Remember, it is not voluntary taxation. I'm not sure how self-publishing >postage for packages differs from self-publishing stamps for first class mail, but >I'll explore that possibility and if it is in fact a free way to get postage >at my computer without paying Pitney Bowes or some other company for the >privilege of saving the government and taxpayers the costs of printing and >publishing stamps, etc. In the meantime perhaps you can perhaps explain how >disagreeing with your interpretation of free enterprise makes me a Communist? Nor >do I believe I am one of those Viva Cuba Libre. In fact when I was out there >attempting to control the adverse effects of the Marialito invasion of the >U.S. by Cuba I don't remember you participating in that anti-Communist sparring >event either. > >And, you deliberately mischaracterize my comment that when the government, >for better or worse, decides with public ratification to provide a public >service it should not facilitate the creation of industries that piggy-back off >of that service and through a cooperative effort with the government agency >involved whether it is Haliburton or Pitney Bowes. > >But I sincerely appreciate your concern for fighting my brand of Communism >with great risk to your carpal tunnel processes. That is probably what true >American patriotism and the Minuteman spirit is really about. > >Dr. Steve > >1964 Rolls Royce Silver Cloud III 1975 Pontiac GV Conv. >1980 MB 450SL 1982 RR Corniche >1988 Rolls Royce Silver Spur 1994 F-350 Powerstroke 4x4 >1996 Bronco 2000 Lincoln Town Car >1995 Ferrari 348 Spyder 2004 Excursion >+ Audrey's 3x MB's > >Dr. Stephen B. Spies, CES, CFI >Director, Forensic Sciences Laboratory >Explosives Engineering Technologies > > _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/steve%40stevejenkins.co m Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper
- Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking, (continued)
- Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Dennis Liu, December 4 2006
- Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Todd Walke, December 4 2006
-
Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking BRIGANDBAR, December 4 2006
-
Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Brian E. Buxton, December 4 2006
- Re: WAY OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Steve Jenkins, December 4 2006
- Re: WAY OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Brian E. Buxton, December 4 2006
- Re: WAY OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Steve Jenkins, December 4 2006
- Re: WAY OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Peter Pless, December 4 2006
- Re: WAY OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Brian E. Buxton, December 4 2006
-
Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Brian E. Buxton, December 4 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.