Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Dennis Liu (BigHeadDennis![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 11:25:00 -0800 (PST) |
You can buy your postage without any fee, directly from the Post Office. Either buy stamps, or use the USPS free service for parcels, as Jeff mentioned. If you use a postage meter, you pay the postage meter company. If you use a digital equivalent of a postage meter, you pay the digital equivalent of a postage meter company. The USPS does not offer either a postage meter or a digital equivalent of a postage meter. It has left that up to the free market. So, bottom line, you're advocating that the GOVERNMENT should step in and compete against private companies -- by undercutting their charges and giving away stuff for free??? Again, to paraphrase SteveJ, are you a Communist? Viva Cuba Libre! You want the government to take over a role being offered by private, free market enterprises??? By your same philosophy, the government should cut out the middleman and just nationalize gas stations and liquor stores. Why have free enterprise get their cut? "Everyone" would be better off if the government just bought all the gasoline wholesale and sell it directly to the PEOPLE. And the same with alcohol. Let's see, what else can we nationalize? Phone service? Internet access? Cable systems? And don't forget the golden rule: TANSTAAFL! If the USPS went ahead and spent millions of dollars to come up with the same software, infrastructure, etc. that Endicia and Stamps.com did, but did NOT charge a fee for it, where do you think that money would come from? Money is fungible. ALL users of the USPS would have to bear those costs, instead of ONLY those users that use the service. So you want everyone who buys postage to subsidize Dr Stephen B. Spies' use of this digital postal system, because you don't want to pay $99.95 (not $120) per year? Oh, the IRS gives you forms. It doesn't give you Turbotax for free. vty, --Dennis _____ From: BRIGANDBAR [at] aol.com [mailto:BRIGANDBAR [at] aol.com] Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 2:02 PM To: BigHeadDennis [at] earthlink.net Cc: ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: [Ferrari] Related to Business Banking In a message dated 12/4/2006 12:16:55 P.M. Central Standard Time, BigHeadDennis [at] earthlink.net writes: Or are you bitching about why the USPS doesn't offer this service to you DIRECTLY, and avoid "the middleman" and their $10/month fees? The USPS has been around for a thousand years. It has to apply to congress to get postal rates raised enough to cover their costs. Actually, the Office of Postmaster General in the Cabinet and the U.S. Post Office have been around from the start of the nation, but recently (in comparative terms) the U.S. Postal Service as a governmental corporation was formed and yes it is a big bureaucracy but now with highly bonused self-interested managers (not that this is entirely all bad, but many within the Service think that it is). Yes, I am bitching about why they don't offer this service directly to me (as a taxpayer) without the middleman (and additional costs and profits that are derived from what is in reality an oligopoly position) and the damn $10.00 fee. I don't need or want to do anything but purchase postage from a U.S. governmental agency without paying a middleman for the privilege of interacting with an agency that my tax dollars support. Should you have to go through a middleman just to file for Social Security or Veterans' Benefits? This is just a cooperative scam to cost small businesses an extra $120.00/yr in tribute to someone who offers little or nothing of value and who would probably cease to exist at all if postage was directly marketed to the public at the same rates charged at the Post Office. Of course, then one might argue that a bunch of postal would be laid off because folks used electronic postage just as they use e-mail, etc. And, of course the government would save the cost of(and employees required for) printing the stamps, gasoline consumption would be down because folks wouldn't need to leave their houses to buy the stamps, and things could just run smoothly. Yes, I do resent being taxed again by an unnecessary industry created by a favored few to interfere with our access to a government function. And, incidentally, while I'll have to research the software issue, the IRS does offer free downloads of virtually every form and publication it produces without requiring me to pay tribute to the "special people" Dr. Steve 1964 Rolls Royce Silver Cloud III 1975 Pontiac GV Conv. 1980 MB 450SL 1982 RR Corniche 1988 Rolls Royce Silver Spur 1994 F-350 Powerstroke 4x4 1996 Bronco 2000 Lincoln Town Car 1995 Ferrari 348 Spyder 2004 Excursion + Audrey's 3x MB's Dr. Stephen B. Spies, CES, CFI Director, Forensic Sciences Laboratory Explosives Engineering Technologies Legal Notice: This message does not constitute legal or other professional advice, nor does it create an Attorney/Client, or other confidential or fiduciary relationship between the sender and/or any other party Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 2510-2521, and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium please so advise the sender immediately. Electronic Transmission Security Notice: E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of the message that arise as a result of its electronic (e-mail) transmission.
-
Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking BRIGANDBAR, December 4 2006
- Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Dennis Liu, December 4 2006
- Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Todd Walke, December 4 2006
-
Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking BRIGANDBAR, December 4 2006
-
Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Brian E. Buxton, December 4 2006
- Re: WAY OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Steve Jenkins, December 4 2006
-
Re: OFF TOPIC - RE: Related to Business Banking Brian E. Buxton, December 4 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.