Re: 550 cost of ownership?
From: Brian E. Buxton (BrianBuxtonBuxtonMotorsports.com)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:23:35 -0800 (PST)
The problem with that 550 was the owner took it to the dealer with an open checkbook and the service dept, was happy to take advantage o the situation. If two rear tires are $800.00 there is no way a fluid and filter change (a 15K service) should cost $1,500.00+.

Brian




Dave Craig wrote:

First off, this is meant as no disrespect to Michael Sheehan.  He was just
documenting what some other guys were actually doing.  I respect Michael's
opinion a lot and view him as a very valuable member of the Ferrari
community.

Ok, around 2 years ago we had a discussion about the 550.  At the time it
was said by a few owners and others that the 550s and 575s were by far the
most daily drivable Grand Touring 2 seater Ferraris ever made.  It was also
pointed out that the maintenance was actually cheaper than the maintenance
on the V8 counterparts due to the ease in which the timing belts could be
changed and general engine access.  And that the maintenance costs are way
way cheaper than the maintenance costs on an older V12 car (the specific
example was the TR and 512TR series of cars).  This was also confirmed by a
few Ferrari dealerships that I have been in.  I was told that the 30K
maintenance on a 550 is significantly cheaper than the 30K on a 360, 355,
348, or even a 328, not to mention a TR or 512TR.

So, either this car is not indicative of the typical 550, or these guys just
had way more money than brains (this is the answer I pick).


Ok, since it has been a little while since this was discussed, is the 550
cheaper, basically the same, or more expensive to own than any other Ferrari
and why?


Dave Craig




Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.