Re: Not So "Smart" Car (was Tulsa Event) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: ken rentiers (rentiers![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:24:17 -0700 (PDT) |
On Oct 13, 2007, at 7:56 PM, Britt wrote:
In many large cities over here the Smart works great, traffic speeds are
low, the congestion charges are lower as are the road taxes and unlike
motorcycles/mopeds/bicycles ect you have a roof over your head for all the
crap
weather. They turn on a dime and can park nose in to the crub legally
(like a
motorbike).
All well. but why would you then advocate the same vehicle in an environment where traffic speeds are high ( like 70 - 80 mph on the freeways). there are no congestion charges or road taxes and no nose- in parking is permitted. Fwiw I think an F350 dualie would be a Dumb vehicle to drive in inner London or Paris but it makes perfect sense here for many folks.
I can imagine the horror of the effete French if Ford pickups were introduced, don't be too hard on us for recoiling when we see a Smart. Our roads have already been infested with the mobile chicanes known as a "Prius".
What the world needs now is a decently priced flux capacitor.
-
Re: Not So "Smart" Car (was Tulsa Event) BRIGANDBAR, October 13 2007
- Re: Not So "Smart" Car (was Tulsa Event) LarryT, October 13 2007
-
Re: Not So "Smart" Car (was Tulsa Event) Britt2Asa, October 13 2007
-
Re: Not So "Smart" Car (was Tulsa Event) Dan Warlick, October 13 2007
- Re: Not So "Smart" Car (was Tulsa Event) ken rentiers, October 13 2007
- Re: Not So "Smart" Car (was Tulsa Event) Tom Reynolds, October 14 2007
- Message not available
- Re: Not So "Smart" Car (was Tulsa Event) Tom Reynolds, October 14 2007
- Re: Not So "Smart" Car (was Tulsa Event) Dan Warlick, October 14 2007
-
Re: Not So "Smart" Car (was Tulsa Event) Dan Warlick, October 13 2007
- Re: Not So "Smart" Car (was Tulsa Event) ken rentiers, October 14 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.