Re: Well, that just about sums it up (with lots of TECH and Ferrari Content, but no opinions added) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: LS (lashdeep![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:53:13 -0800 (PST) |
Yes! Being done now... ----- Original Message ---- From: Fellippe Galletta <fellippe.galletta [at] gmail.com> To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2007 1:33:42 PM Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Well, that just about sums it up (with lots of TECH and Ferrari Content, but no opinions added) Just curious... Is it possible to get a lot of revs from a pushrod motor? Say a redline above 7000 rpm....up to 8000 or more? Not that its necessary, but there is an allure to a very high revving motor just for the sound of it. :) FG On Dec 6, 2007 1:26 PM, LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> wrote: > DL-"I'm pretty much blown away by this statement from Lashdeep." > > LS-"I think you're missing the > point again on why these cars are not in the least bit impressive from an > engine tech standpoint." > > To keep things technical, let's examine the Ford GT's 5.4 liter > supercharged V8, one of the forced induction supercars on Dennis' list. > > It's extremely strong and makes about 550bhp. It has DOHC, 32 valves, 4 > camshafts overhead and a supercharger. This basic engine is also used in the > Koenigsegg (all models despite their shady "bespoke" claim). It's fuel > economy is not so great either. > > Comparing that engine with a typical pushrod V8 makes for an interesting > demonstration (see post #37) : > > http://corner-carvers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=21944&highlight=teksid > > This image shows the Ford Modular motor, in this case a 4.6 liter sitting > next to a pushrod V8, in this case a Ford 302. The Ford GT uses basically > the engine on the left, PLUS a supercharger. > > The LS V8 is VERY similar in dimensions to the 5.0 V8. In fact, I can > produce exact dimensions of the 302 as I have a spare at home I can measure. > If anyone wants the exact numbers of either that or the LS V8 (showing that > they are similar), please call me after 8pm tonight and I can measure both > for you. 202-236-4589. > > Regardless, the above picture is frightening...for just one moment, put > yourself in a car/engine builder's shoes. Assuming that both the pushrod and > the blown OHC engine make the same power (which they can) and both rev > comfortably to 8000rpm (which they both can)...which would you want in your > performance oriented car? > > An OHC engine with 4 cams, 32 valves and a supercharger making up a bulk > of the weight high in the engine, just underneath the hood? > > Or would you prefer the dramatically smaller and lighter, normally > aspirated pushrod design? As a cherry on top (or on bottom for better weight > distribution), the pushrod gets much better fuel economy as well thanks to > impressive engine mgmt... > > >From an engineering standpoint, it's a tough point to ignore no? > > The SL65 comparison would be very simliar to the one above...two turbos > add a lot of weight, heat, oil and coolant...what a mess. The M5 V10 is > soooo huge it's scary. If you get the chance to see one outside of a car, > you will soil your knickers. That thing has no business being in a > performance car or parked outside a Sierra Club meeting for that matter. > > Is this science fiction? > > It might seem that way...I didn't want to believe it. Hell, one of my > "babies" has the Ford Mod motor pictured above. But now, in Dec 2007, it > seems like silly complication at best...especially if you like track > performance or balanced handling...and saving fuel. > > In hopes of sparking the elusive technical discussion (without any car > religion or personal preferences involved), what would be the next step in > ultimate performance engine design? > > Ferrari has an amazing reputation for translating racing tech into street > tech. They were testing an early form of paddle shifters in '78 with Gilles. > That feature evolved and eventually changed street motoring. > > What is next? I'd like to see a pneumatic valvetrain discussion with pros > and cons. Will the elimination of the valve spring and its weight high atop > the engine more than counter act the additional weight of the pressure tank > and hard air lines? Is this something we could see in a future V8 > Ferrarimodel? > > Someone, please chime in...this could be fun! > > LS > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Dennis Liu <bigheaddennis [at] gmail.com> > To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com> > Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> > Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2007 10:25:02 PM > Subject: [Ferrari] Well, that just about sums it up > > I'm pretty much blown away by this statement from Lashdeep. I think it > pretty much shows his POV. Ask yourself if you really think this is > correct. > > >Regarding the supercars you listed...their powertrain engineers should be > fired. They couldn't figure out how to make that power out of n/a engine > technology? Or lighten their vehicles? I'd love to see engine weights and > sizes...prob not so impressive at that point. Anyone can throw a blower > onto > a motor. Where is the skill or technology there? I think you're missing > the > point again on why these cars are not in the least bit impressive from an > engine tech standpoint. And...I don't think I can type this point up > again. > > ============== > > So... all of the powertrain engineers at Porsche, Mercedes-Benz, Bentley, > Bugatti, Audi, Jaguar, Ford, Audi, Lotus and even Chevrolet are idiots, > and > the guys building and selling custom V8s in their garages are geniuses? > > Wow. > > Well, that's it for me. I'm outta here.... > > vty, > > --Dennis > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/lashdeep%40yahoo.com > > Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > http://www.BidNip.com/ <http://www.bidnip.com/> > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ <http://www.f1headlines.com/> > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Looking for last minute shopping deals? > Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. > http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/fellippe.galletta%40gmail.com > > Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > http://www.BidNip.com/ <http://www.bidnip.com/> > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ <http://www.f1headlines.com/> > _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/lashdeep%40yahoo.com Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper http://www.BidNip.com/ and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
- Re: Well, that just about sums it up (with lots of TECH and Ferrari Content, but no opinions added), (continued)
- Re: Well, that just about sums it up (with lots of TECH and Ferrari Content, but no opinions added) Jim Brown, December 6 2007
- Re: Well, that just about sums it up (with lots of TECH and Ferrari Content, but no opinions added) Hans E. Hansen, December 6 2007
- Re: Well, that just about sums it up (with lots of TECH and Ferrari Content, but no opinions added) Dave Craig, December 6 2007
- Re: Well, that just about sums it up (with lots of TECH and Ferrari Content, but no opinions added) LS, December 6 2007
- Re: Well, that just about sums it up (with lots of TECH and Ferrari Content, but no opinions added) Jim Brown, December 6 2007
- Re: Well, that just about sums it up (with lots of TECH and Ferrari Content, but no opinions added) Rick Moseley, December 6 2007
- Re: Well, that just about sums it up (with lots of TECH and Ferrari Content, but no opinions added) LS, December 10 2007
- Re: Well, that just about sums it up (with lots of TECH and Ferrari Content, but no opinions added) LS, December 10 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.