Re: Bertone 308 GT/4 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Tom Reynolds (kjtar![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:35:45 -0800 (PST) |
Bertone had something on the old man and subsequently was owed a favor. Hey, why not? TominTulsa ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fellippe Galletta" <fellippe.galletta [at] gmail.com> To: "Tom Reynolds" <kjtar [at] cox.net> Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 4:45 PM Subject: [Ferrari] Bertone 308 GT/4 > Someone asked me today about why Ferrari went to Bertone and not Pininfarina > for the 308 GT/4, and I wasn't sure why. > > Does anyone know the story? > > FG > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/kjtar%40cox.net > > Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper > http://www.BidNip.com/ > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > > > -- > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/714 - Release Date: 3/8/07 > >
- Re: Bertone 308 GT/4, (continued)
-
Re: Bertone 308 GT/4 clyderomero, December 21 2007
- Re: Bertone 308 GT/4 Dan Warlick, December 21 2007
- Re: Bertone 308 GT/4 Ferrarisimo [at] Comcast.net, December 21 2007
- Re: Bertone 308 GT/4 Hans E. Hansen, December 21 2007
- Re: Bertone 308 GT/4 Tom Reynolds, December 21 2007
-
Re: Bertone 308 GT/4 clyderomero, December 21 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.