Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: JAshburne (JAshburne![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:32:52 -0700 (PDT) |
And I absolutely enjoy scanning the different news outlets to see how and what they are reporting the "news". I even enjoy watching Bill Maher although I find it absolutely incredible that anyone places anything other than humor value on his political views. In a message dated 3/14/2008 8:27:46 A.M. Central Daylight Time, JAshburne [at] aol.com writes: Ooops! And the correction/retraction will be buried, let me guess, behind the obituaries? In a message dated 3/14/2008 8:24:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time, rentiers [at] mac.com writes: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/afp/20080312/img/ppl-us-politics-newyork-gov-1-4e48f9 b2ad981.html On Mar 14, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Michael James wrote: > > Most of the News organizations you mentioned had already > 'informed' us > that Spitzer had formally endorsed Hillary Clinton's candidacy for > President, making the general public well-aware of Spitzer's > political > party affiliation. We-the-people didn't need 'Democrat' Spitzer > mentioned ad-nauseum, because we already knew in-spades (unless more > Repubs like Ann Coultier are now endorsing Hillary....I hear Satan > just turned up the A/C a tizz) - hence, all the media's interest in > trying to tie Clinton in with the story, drawing parallels regarding > Spitzer's marriage with Bill/Hillary, the in-depth, psycho- > analysis of > Hillary's comments regarding Spitzer's fall, etc. etc. etc. I > gather > you're not accutely following the actions of the Democratic ticket > race, read Newsweek, Time, MSNBC, SLATE, or, well anything BUT > FarceNews, so you 'might' have missed all of this.....but the rest > of > us are already saturated/tired of it. > > > Thank God my Ferrari need some work, I can retreat to the garage > this > weekend.... > > > --- On Fri, 3/14/08, JAshburne [at] aol.com <JAshburne [at] aol.com> > wrote: > > From: JAshburne [at] aol.com <JAshburne [at] aol.com> > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Betrayal of Journalists > To: "Michael" <Cavallino_Rapante [at] yahoo.com> > Cc: ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com > Date: Friday, March 14, 2008, 8:50 AM > Last time I looked, Spitzer was solidly Democratic. Not something > that the > liberal media is anxious to include in their news reports, > certainly not as > often as tying the word "Republican" to what ever transgressions done > on that > side of the aisle. > > Look, whether we are talking Jim McGreevy (Gay American), Ted the > Cape Cod > Orca Kennedy, William Jefferson BJ Clinton, Barney Frank, Jerry > Studds (a name > > perfect for male porn movies) etc. etc or any of the Republicans you > mentioned, there is no exclusivity of either party in sexual > escapades. In > fact > there is more in common as politicians being power hungry, ego > feeding sexual > predators rather than one party being more active than the other. > They have > more in common than differences. > > The original comment was more on the manner in which the media > differentiates its news coverage between the two parties. The slant > in the > reporting by > the NY Times, MSNBC, USA Today, Time Magazine, the Washington Post > et al is > much more likely to downplay the Democrat affiliation than the > Republican > affiliation. > > John **************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money & Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)
- Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong, (continued)
-
Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong Michael James, March 14 2008
-
Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong red5hilser, March 14 2008
- Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong Mike, March 14 2008
- Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong Doug and Terri Anderson, March 14 2008
-
Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong red5hilser, March 14 2008
-
Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong Michael James, March 14 2008
- Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong JAshburne, March 14 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.