| Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: red5hilser (red5hilser |
|
| Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:01:33 -0700 (PDT) | |
Hey Michael: Speaking of the UK, does anybody but me rebember Cabinet Member
John Profumo and his two young British?hookers,?Chistine Keller,?and Mandy
Rice-Davies? ?Now that was a REAL scandal that equaled our own beloved ex-Prez,
Slick Willy and his 'hide the cigar' trick, using?Monica as his humidor.
John and his 'youthful bedroom hijinks' caused the Queen much embarrassment.
Believe me, wherever you have a horny man with lots of power and $$$, you'll
find some bright, young thing of the opposite sex in every closet.
And paying $4,300 per visit? Get Serious! After taking a look at her website,
hell, I remember busting better looking street whores who were only charging
$20 on Hwy 39 in Anaheim. I could have gotten him a pair of good looking 19
year-old twins for $100. Oh well, it was only the tax-payers' money anyway.
Go figure, yer pal, Ferrari Bubba
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Journalists - Getting It Wrong
Well, since you posted Yahoo UK/IRELAND....who are, undoubtedly,
having a good laugh about all of this with their Guinness and no
strangers to political scandal, press/tabloid coverage, and what-not,
will it really matter to them?
--- On Fri, 3/14/08, JAshburne [at] aol.com <JAshburne [at] aol.com> wrote:
From: JAshburne [at] aol.com <JAshburne [at] aol.com>
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Journalists - Getting It Wrong
To: "Michael" <Cavallino_Rapante [at] yahoo.com>
Cc: ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com
Date: Friday, March 14, 2008, 9:26 AM
Ooops! And the correction/retraction will be buried, let me guess, behind
the obituaries?
In a message dated 3/14/2008 8:24:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
rentiers [at] mac.com writes:
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/afp/20080312/img/ppl-us-politics-newyork-gov-1-4e48f9
b2ad981.html
On Mar 14, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Michael James wrote:
>
> Most of the News organizations you mentioned had already
> 'informed' us
> that Spitzer had formally endorsed Hillary Clinton's candidacy for
> President, making the general public well-aware of Spitzer's
> political
> party affiliation. We-the-people didn't need 'Democrat'
Spitzer
> mentioned ad-nauseum, because we already knew in-spades (unless more
> Repubs like Ann Coultier are now endorsing Hillary....I hear Satan
> just turned up the A/C a tizz) - hence, all the media's interest in
> trying to tie Clinton in with the story, drawing parallels regarding
> Spitzer's marriage with Bill/Hillary, the in-depth, psycho-
> analysis of
> Hillary's comments regarding Spitzer's fall, etc. etc. etc. I
> gather
> you're not accutely following the actions of the Democratic ticket
> race, read Newsweek, Time, MSNBC, SLATE, or, well anything BUT
> FarceNews, so you 'might' have missed all of this.....but the
rest
> of
> us are already saturated/tired of it.
>
>
> Thank God my Ferrari need some work, I can retreat to the garage
> this
> weekend....
>
>
> --- On Fri, 3/14/08, JAshburne [at] aol.com <JAshburne [at] aol.com> wrote:
>
> From: JAshburne [at] aol.com <JAshburne [at] aol.com>
> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Betrayal of Journalists
> To: "Michael" <Cavallino_Rapante [at] yahoo.com>
> Cc: ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com
> Date: Friday, March 14, 2008, 8:50 AM
> Last time I looked, Spitzer was solidly Democratic. Not something
> that the
> liberal media is anxious to include in their news reports,
> certainly not as
> often as tying the word "Republican" to what ever
transgressions done
> on that
> side of the aisle.
>
> Look, whether we are talking Jim McGreevy (Gay American), Ted the
> Cape Cod
> Orca Kennedy, William Jefferson BJ Clinton, Barney Frank, Jerry
> Studds (a name
>
> perfect for male porn movies) etc. etc or any of the Republicans you
> mentioned, there is no exclusivity of either party in sexual
> escapades. In
> fact
> there is more in common as politicians being power hungry, ego
> feeding sexual
> predators rather than one party being more active than the other.
> They have
> more in common than differences.
>
> The original comment was more on the manner in which the media
> differentiates its news coverage between the two parties. The slant
> in the
> reporting by
> the NY Times, MSNBC, USA Today, Time Magazine, the Washington Post
> et al is
> much more likely to downplay the Democrat affiliation than the
> Republican
> affiliation.
>
> John
>
>
**************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money &
Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/cavallino_rapante%40yahoo.
com
Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper
http://www.BidNip.com/
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/
_________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals? [1]Find them fast with Yahoo!
Search.
References
1.
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51734/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/red5hilser%40aol.com
Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper
http://www.BidNip.com/
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/
-
Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong JAshburne, March 14 2008
-
Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong Michael James, March 14 2008
- Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong red5hilser, March 14 2008
- Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong Mike, March 14 2008
- Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong Doug and Terri Anderson, March 14 2008
-
Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong Michael James, March 14 2008
- Re: Journalists - Getting It Wrong JAshburne, March 14 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.