Re: Fwd:Kalifornia Rules! | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: LarryT (l02turner![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 07:08:43 -0700 (PDT) |
Doug wrote <<Well, Kalifornia DOES have 9 of 10 dirtiest counties in the
USofA. Out of
3,143 counties >>
This is just a question (it may be a crazy comment) - I have no backup for this thought - Just wondering if -- Since southern Ka. is basically a desert bowl and the mountains help keep ocean breezes from cleansing the land (correct?) - wouldn't the air be fairly stale even without cars running around? IOW, how much would the air improve even if there were *no* cars? As I write this I keep thinking that while the air would be stale (stagnant?) because of the geographical conditions it *is* made worse by cars and factories, etc, but isn't there a limit to how clean the air can get? If that's a correct statement, doesn't going after '76 and older cars, many classics & admittedly a tiny part of the auto population - a silly thing to do? I would think it would p_$$ off a lot of upper middle class and above people who may be politically active?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug and Terri Anderson" <dnt [at] dock.net>
To: "Larry Turner" <l02turner [at] comcast.net>
Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Fwd:Kalifornia Rules!
3,143 counties >>
This is just a question (it may be a crazy comment) - I have no backup for this thought - Just wondering if -- Since southern Ka. is basically a desert bowl and the mountains help keep ocean breezes from cleansing the land (correct?) - wouldn't the air be fairly stale even without cars running around? IOW, how much would the air improve even if there were *no* cars? As I write this I keep thinking that while the air would be stale (stagnant?) because of the geographical conditions it *is* made worse by cars and factories, etc, but isn't there a limit to how clean the air can get? If that's a correct statement, doesn't going after '76 and older cars, many classics & admittedly a tiny part of the auto population - a silly thing to do? I would think it would p_$$ off a lot of upper middle class and above people who may be politically active?
;-)
Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D) www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil PORSCHE POSTERS! youroil.net 800-583-8601 Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs
----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug and Terri Anderson" <dnt [at] dock.net>
To: "Larry Turner" <l02turner [at] comcast.net>
Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Fwd:Kalifornia Rules!
Only in the San Joaquin valley for now...http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/31/ca-looking-to-remove-smog-exemption-from-pre-1976-cars/
Well, Kalifornia DOES have 9 of 10 dirtiest counties in the USofA. Out of 3,143 counties in the USofA only Harris County in Texas breaks up the monopoly.
Stay tuned for more fun from the cereal state, the land of fruits and nuts.
DOUG
_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/l02turner%40comcast.net
Sponsored by BidNip.com eBay Auction Sniper
http://www.BidNip.com/
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/
- Re: Fwd:Kalifornia Rules!, (continued)
-
Re: Fwd:Kalifornia Rules! Doug and Terri Anderson, March 31 2008
-
Re: Fwd:Kalifornia Rules! Ken Rentiers, April 1 2008
- Re: Fwd:Kalifornia Rules! Doug and Terri Anderson, April 1 2008
- Re: Fwd:Kalifornia Rules! Ken Rentiers, April 1 2008
-
Re: Fwd:Kalifornia Rules! Ken Rentiers, April 1 2008
- Re: Fwd:Kalifornia Rules! LarryT, April 1 2008
- Re: Fwd:Kalifornia Rules! ken rentiers, April 1 2008
- Was Kalifornia Rules - Now Kalifornia Smog - Doug and Terri Anderson, April 2 2008
-
Re: Fwd:Kalifornia Rules! Doug and Terri Anderson, March 31 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.