Re: Ferrari Digest, Vol 21, Issue 30 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: BRIGANDBAR (BRIGANDBAR![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:01:05 -0700 (PDT) |
In a message dated 4/28/2008 11:44:16 PM Central Daylight Time, ferrari-request [at] ferrarilist.com writes: On another note...why do people sell their Ferrari for a Vette? They are so different...should have both. First of all, as an outcast in Bowling Green, KY, home of the Corvette, I am used to being on the defensive about owning the Ferrari ILO a ZO6 Corvetter so accept that this fact may temper my answer. As to selling the Ferrari for a Vette, well even if economics and the cost of ownership and insurance of two of these cars, there is the question of having enough time left over after spending the time on the job required to pay for two of these cars to fully enjoy both of them. Then there is the question of available space, though as one might readily surmise after reading the list of automobiles resident here it is not always the case. Without room for secure storage (particularly in a city where there is a ready market for the disposition of these cars on the criminal black market for export or the chop shops) there is the question of remote, off-site storage. Even with the customary three car garage, a daily driver for each of the adults in the family, plus the needs of any chldren of driving age can strain these resources. Here, we've filled the new (3600 sq. ft.) garage as well as the four car on the house and the two car RR detached garage on the far side of driveway. I keep promising to sell one of the cars before I buy the next one and this time I'm going to stick to it, construction costs alone have shown me I have achieved the limit on the size of a home fleet of automobiles. Twenty-five acres of homestead offers some opportunities not available to city dwellers. Of course, that rule won't apply to the Ferrari when I get around to the ZO6. If I don't replace the SL with a Volante 12 cyl. (they seem to depreciate more readily making them more economically feasible to acquire than a second Ferrari), the ZO6 Vette will be the final, non-replacement addition. Wifes says "I've heard that before". Then there is maintenance costs and availability. The trade-off for the ability to reside in location where a twenty-five acre homesite is available. I dread the upcoming day when the 348 needs the regularly scheduled timing belt, et. al., service. I know that the closest opportunity for an independent shop is Nashville. And it more likely require a trailer ride either up to Indianapolis or down to Atlanta to find a dealership. This takes more than the money required to pay for it, it takes the time to make the trip, and to make a second trip to pick it up. As I recall, most dealership shops are not open on weekends, and additionally, I'm prone to a shakedown cruise just to satisfy myself that all is well prior to leaving for home, only to have to return the car to the shop for corrective action. Finally, there is the question of the cost of insurance. Liability alone, even with an umbrella policy can become oppressive. I get wonderful Christmas cards and hams from my agent already. Depending upon where one lives, or has domiciles, the cost of full coverage on some of these cars can cost more than the hybrid that the government is trying to force us to buy as a commuting car. All in all, there are some practical reasons and a degree of pragmatism, to exchanging the Ferrari for the Vette, or vice versa, as opposed to owning one of each. Dr. Steve Dr. Stephen B. Spies, CES, CFI Director, Forensic Sciences Laboratory Explosives Engineering Technologies 1964 Rolls Royce Silver Cloud III.....1975 Pontiac Grandville 1980 MB 450 SL............................1982 Rolls Royce Corniche DHC 1988 Rolls Royce Silver Spur..........1994 F-350 PowerStroke Diesel 1995 Ferrari 348 Spyder.................1996 Ford Bronco 2000 Lincoln Town Car....................2004 Ford Excursion + a 1985 MB 280GE Galedenwagen for Explorations + a 1976 HAHN- WARNER & SWASEY- DUPLEX DIVISION HOWE APPARTUS. THE MODEL #R400 FIRE TRUCK w/a 100' Tower System + a 1985 GMC Brigadier Farm Truck/20T Wrecker & Audrey's 2 MB's [1980 450SL & 1987 420SEL] to care for... Legal Notice: This message does not constitute legal or other professional advice, nor does it create an Attorney/Client, or other confidential or fiduciary relationship between the sender and/or any other party Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 2510-2521, and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium please so advise the sender immediately. Electronic Transmission Security Notice: Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of the message that arise as a result of its electronic (e-mail) transmission. **************Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car listings at AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
-
Re: Ferrari Digest, Vol 21, Issue 30 BRIGANDBAR, April 29 2008
- Re: Ferrari Digest, Vol 21, Issue 30 LS, April 29 2008
- Re: Ferrari Digest, Vol 21, Issue 30 BRIGANDBAR, April 29 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.