Re: Illinois speed traps | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: JAshburne (JAshburne![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 23:01:28 -0700 (PDT) |
1. If there was oil on those leases, don't you think that they would drill there before drilling 5,000 feet into the seabed? I know that I would, drilling on land is much less capital intensive and less costly. 2. Of course it would sell on the open market, it is a global market unless the taxpayers subsidize it, like in Venezuela. Increased supply does matter in helping prices come down, just as keeping prices unnaturally low will create shortages against a fixed supply. Look what happened when the govt. tried price controls in 1973 and 1978: controlled price led to unchecked demand which led to long lines at the gas stations. Thankfully people are rationing themselves this time and it is working much better than having the govt. try to manage prices. 3. If you are the owner of the raw materials and the price goes up, yes you make more profit. That's why you bought the reserves and spent the capital to develop those reserves in the first place. Increasing supply against depletion of those reserves ain't so easy. Not everyone in the oil business is making more money. Have you seen what has happened to the profits of those who are not integrated? The refiner/distributors have gotten reduced profits because the price of crude has gone up more than the price of gas (lower crack spread), so it could be worse for drivers if the price of a gallon of gas had gone up as much as a barrel of crude. The market is far more complex than a simplistic view that the oil companies are controlling prices by holding back supply. For those who don't believe that supply and demand is making the biggest impact on prices, take a look at the price of oil in the past month. $147/barrel one month ago, $115/barrel today, down 22% because people are driving about 2% less as a result of the higher prices. Now that is price leverage and shows that price elasticity does kick in at some point. The average return on sales for a large integrated oil producer is 10%, even in these times of "windfall" profits. Even public electric utilities that are regulated are able to convince the regulators that they need a larger profit margin. Exxon Mobil's profit margin is 11.3% and is the best in its sector. Google's profit margin is 25.3% and Microsoft's profit margin is 29.3%. Why isn't Congress looking into "windfall" profit taxes on Google and Microsoft? The answer is that it is a lot easier to paint "Big Oil" as a villain. But if controlling profits of companies was the priority of Congress (which it sure as hell shouldn't be in a free market economy) then why wouldn't they start with those companies who are making the biggest profit margins? You may see $10/gallon for gas before you check out (move to Britain and you can pay that today) but by then all of the alternative fuel sources will have become economic and will be replacing dino fuel. Those sources may not be cheaper than gas was in the good old days (that's why gas and oil became so widely used, they are cheaper than the alternatives, even now) but they eventually will replace oil. Just MHO In a message dated 8/8/2008 8:19:34 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, sherman [at] wildblue.net writes: 1.When the Oil companies use the leases they have I would support off shore but not until then. 2. Don't expect American Oil not to sell on the open market. 3. Think about it:If your raw materials have gone up and your product has gone up and you are selling less of your product AND you HAVE RECORD PROFITS would you increase your supply of raw materials or build more factories so you produce more product and make less profit. Don't think so. I was in line at a fast food establishment after Katrina and was talking to an oil man about the $3 gasoline and he said 'I did not see you complain when I was getting $10 a barrel for my oil. And remember these are the good days. I am 64 and I expect to see $10 a gallon b4 I check out. Stephen 81 308 GTSi **************Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00050000000017 )
- Re: Illinois speed traps, (continued)
- Re: Illinois speed traps LarryT, August 9 2008
- Re: Illinois speed traps red5hilser, August 8 2008
-
Re: Illinois speed traps Doug and Terri Anderson, August 8 2008
- Re: Illinois speed traps LarryT, August 9 2008
- Re: Illinois speed traps JAshburne, August 8 2008
- Re: Illinois speed traps JAshburne, August 8 2008
-
Re: Illinois speed traps Britt2Asa, August 9 2008
- Re: Illinois speed traps philville dejazzd.com, August 9 2008
- Re: Illinois speed traps JAshburne, August 9 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.