Re: "Economics" | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Steve Jenkins (steve![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:01:09 -0800 (PST) |
How much extra have I kicked in to pay for the war effort? Way more than my fair share on April 15th, then July 15th, then October 14th, then January 15th, then April 15th, then July 15th, then October 15th, then... well, you get the picture. Someone mentioned in this thread the top tier tax rate being 36%. Don't forget self-employment tax! I pay another 7.5% on top of that for the "priviledge" of taking all the risk and working the ultimate commission job: working for myself. Throw in an almost 10% sales tax in my state (WA) and crazy property taxes in King County (I pay over $20K a year in taxes for the priviledge of living on land I own free-and-clear). Wow! I get to keep around half of what I make! Just because it's legal doesn't make it fair. :) SJ -----Original Message----- From: Michael James [mailto:cavallino_rapante [at] yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 6:28 PM To: Steve Jenkins Cc: The FerrariList Subject: Re: [Ferrari] "Economics" Hey, Hey! I'm a centrist at worst - I've seen both sides of this political fence, and trust me there are way too many purple-haired liberals up here in MA to shove the likes of me within arm's length of Limbaugh himself. I'm just not 'buying' into the sky-is-falling on the high-wage-earner crowd. The sky is falling on EVERYONE regardless of social class. If a rising tide floats all boats, a lowering tide will sink all of them, too. This isn't a time for our weathiest Americans to think they're being 'picked-on'....to me, that's just plain silly. Who amongst us is weeping for the disappearing middle class? Or am I to believe that they are unaffected by all this? Anyone on FList lose their house lately? Or do they not matter in Ric's economic model, since he may not be one of them? I'm very sorry if the salaried-employees of the world (myself included) are not fit to sit at his table. Last time I checked, I've paid into the system FAR more than I've ever gotten out of it, if anything. Ric wants to rant and rave about 'social welfare programs' all he wants to, he's dancing around what its really called: Social Security. That ticking time bomb created because all americans are living longer than the benefit was anticipated to cover. That is not a Marxist conspiracy. Thanks to the advances of healthcare, proper diet, exercise, and all that, people are living well into their 90s, and continuing to draw that social benefit - which is only going to get larger and larger and larger (he's right about all that). He's also right that its one of the Govt.'s largest financial expenditures. But he's wrong to point a finger at ME about it. I'm not a Baby Boomer, remember? I don't draw a Social Security check. Never have, and probably never will. My grandmother does, though....she's 86. My great-grandmother does, she's 103 - yes, One Hundred Three. Blame them for your higher taxes, if you must - their only crime is they haven't died yet. I'll let them all know Ric is cheering for their early demise. That social program that Ric is going ballistic over isn't a 'class' issue - wanna cut Social Security? Medicare/Medicade? Go NUTS! Be my guest, I'm pretty sure it won't be around when I'm old enough to use it anyway. Feel free to eliminate Social Security. Seriously. I guarantee you that will eliminate a serious financial crisis our nation faces. Consequences be damned. Lets figure-out how to get rid of all these 'old people' first, though. Make sure everyone 'expires' on the morning of their 68th birthday - past that, and they're dipping into the SS money-trough deeper than what they originally put into the SS system. I don't think its unreasonable to understand that our Govt. has been spending a ton of money on things that it can no longer afford. I'm fairly pragmatic about this. I am employed by a Defense Contractor, I know where my bread is buttered, but we as a company have lost money so Uncle Sam could divert more and more funds to support the war effort. I'm up here in MA building Warships for the US Navy, but we're running a skeleton crew and barely able to keep the lights on. How much extra have all of you kicked-in to pay for the war you all supported so much? Yea, I thought so...lets all pack our bags and move to Guatemala. I don't understand this philosophy. For the past seven years, the USA has undertaken a great campaign against Global Terrorism, and wrung-up a huge tab to provide for our nation's security. The Govt., as a result, has gotten larger in-response to this threat. This was seen, seven years ago, as a necessity to chase and defend against Bin Ladin and his ilk. We-the-People were all on-board with this plan then...The bill for all of this will be paid......when??? Love to all, Michael --- On Wed, 11/12/08, Charles Perry <charles [at] carolina-sound.com> wrote: From: Charles Perry <charles [at] carolina-sound.com> Subject: RE: [Ferrari] "Economics" To: cavallino_rapante [at] yahoo.com Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Date: Wednesday, November 12, 2008, 6:37 PM Mike - When did you become such a flaming liberal? Do you need rescuing from the Northeast? We will help you!! Ric is dead on with all of this. It's not the Pickens or the Buffetts that are suffering from this incessant taxation - it's me! Last year, after paying well into six figures in Federal taxes throughout the year, I found out in April that I owed another $4,000 in Federal taxes thanks to the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) - originally a "soak the rich" tax which is now affecting millions of upper middle class families like mine. You know me - you've been to my house - you know my lifestyle. I am not wallowing in money, and $4k still means a helluva lot to me. Yes, I own some nice cars, but the youngest of which is 10 years old now - I'm not in the "pay an extra $100k for a 599 to be first in SC" club. For me to pay that incremental $4k, my company has to make an extra $10k in profit to pay that to me. For that to happen, we have to sell another $40,000 in goods and services. Each of the four members of my family is in the same position, so our company has to sell another $160,000 in goods and services JUST TO PAY THE AMT - never mind the oppressive regular tax. There are millions of small businesses that don't gross $160k in a year, let alone make that just to "allow" their principles to pay AMT. Furthermore, if we had that extra $40k in profit that we have to use to use for AMT to use for something else, I would hire someone to reduce my 110 hour work week and give me some time with my family. That would be me CREATING A JOB - just like the Dems always claim to want to do. But that job will never exist because of the AMT. And for every new tax that is heaped upon me because I work hard and am therefore "unspeakably wealthy," that is one LESS job that I will create and that much less my company can do to keep the economy moving. Worse, my parents are paying thousands of dollars a month in life insurance premiums to provide a policy that will pay the Death Tax on the value of this business when they die, so that the government doesn't force my brother and I to sell the company that our family has worked decades to build so that the Dems can give half of it to some people who chose not to build anything for themselves. This is really, really, simple stuff and I KNOW you are this smart. I, for one, am definitely crying... -- charles -----Original Message----- From: Michael James [mailto:cavallino_rapante [at] yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 2:33 PM To: Charles Perry Cc: The FerrariList Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Are Ferraris Losing Their Good Looks? For me, its a waste of bandwidth to 'come to the aid' of folks who don't seem to want or need defending. Every time I read of T.Boon Picken's exploits, he's made another $100 Million, he certainly isn't looking for a shoulder to cry on _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/steve%40stevejenkins.co m Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
-
Re: "Economics" Michael James, November 13 2008
- Re: "Economics" Steve Jenkins, November 13 2008
-
Re: "Economics" Hans E. Hansen, November 13 2008
- Re: "Economics" Steve Jenkins, November 13 2008
-
[No Ferrari] "Economics" un founded rumor department alert. philville dejazzd.com, November 14 2008
- Re: [No Ferrari] "Economics" un founded rumor departmentalert. Rich, November 14 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.