Re: [No Ferrari] "Economics" un founded rumor departmentalert. | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rich (Rich355![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:57:15 -0800 (PST) |
It must be true. The Filthadelphia Democrats are joining Atlanta and Phoenix
trying to grab a fistful of $$ Billions$ to bail their liberal cespool
cities out their own created financial messes too.
Rich Mayors of Philadelphia, Phoenix seek bailout shareWASHINGTON (AP) - Three big city mayors asked the federal government Friday to use a portion of the $700 billion financial bailout to assist struggling cities. The mayors sought help with their pension costs, infrastructure investment and cash-flow problems stemming from the global financial crisis.
The mayors-Michael Nutter of Philadelphia, Shirley Franklin of Atlanta and Phil Gordon of Phoenix-made their request in a letter to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D94EQHOG0&show_article=1----- Original Message ----- From: "philville dejazzd.com" <philville [at] dejazzd.com>
To: "Rich" <rich355 [at] comcast.net> Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 3:50 PMSubject: [Ferrari] [No Ferrari] "Economics" un founded rumor departmentalert.
This is with no knowledge of accuracy or basis of fact, but I heard this morning ( from an intelligent source) tha H. Paulson has ram rodded through a law or bill that allows any financial entity who purchases or has purchased a failing financial entity to use the losses of that failing entity as a tax benefit. It seems to me that some one is being screwed out of some thin here, but I am not sure who....I am fairly certain that it is not Paulson The way I see it is that if you generate horrendous liabilities which you can not service so you sell your self to me at a discount price because of these liabilities which never get paid because they are alredy "losses" and then the Fed. allows me to write off the losses for which I have not paid....sounds good to me ....don't we have the collective brain power to turn this into some form of business venture hmmmm is Milken on our mailing?? ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael James <cavallino_rapante [at] yahoo.com> Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008 8:28 pm Subject: Re: [Ferrari] "Economics" To: Phil Tegtmeier <philville [at] dejazzd.com> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> > > > Hey, Hey! I'm a centrist at worst - I've seen both sides of > this political fence, and trust me there are way too many purple- > haired liberals up here in MA to shove the likes of me within > arm's length of Limbaugh himself. I'm just not 'buying' into > the sky-is-falling on the high-wage-earner crowd. > > The sky is falling on EVERYONE regardless of social class. If a > rising tide floats all boats, a lowering tide will sink all of > them, too. This isn't a time for our weathiest Americans to > think they're being 'picked-on'....to me, that's just plain > silly. Who amongst us is weeping for the disappearing middle > class? Or am I to believe that they are unaffected by all > this? Anyone on FList lose their house lately? Or do they not > matter in Ric's economic model, since he may not be one of > them? I'm very sorry if the salaried-employees of the world > (myself included) are not fit to sit at his table. Last time I > checked, I've paid into the system FAR more than I've ever > gotten out of it, if anything. Ric wants to rant and rave about > 'social welfare programs' all he wants to, he's dancing around > what its really called: Social Security. That ticking time > bomb created because all americans are living longer than the > benefit was anticipated to > cover. That is not a Marxist conspiracy. Thanks to the > advances of healthcare, proper diet, exercise, and all that, > people are living well into their 90s, and continuing to draw > that social benefit - which is only going to get larger and > larger and larger (he's right about all that). He's also right > that its one of the Govt.'s largest financial expenditures. But > he's wrong to point a finger at ME about it. I'm not a Baby > Boomer, remember? I don't draw a Social Security check. Never > have, and probably never will. My grandmother does, > though....she's 86. My great-grandmother does, she's 103 - yes, > One Hundred Three. Blame them for your higher taxes, if you > must - their only crime is they haven't died yet. I'll let them > all know Ric is cheering for their early demise. > > That social program that Ric is going ballistic over isn't a > 'class' issue - wanna cut Social Security? Medicare/Medicade? > Go NUTS! Be my guest, I'm pretty sure it won't be around when > I'm old enough to use it anyway. Feel free to eliminate Social > Security. Seriously. I guarantee you that will eliminate a > serious financial crisis our nation faces. Consequences be > damned. Lets figure-out how to get rid of all these 'old > people' first, though. Make sure everyone 'expires' on the > morning of their 68th birthday - past that, and they're dipping > into the SS money-trough deeper than what they originally put > into the SS system. > > I don't think its unreasonable to understand that our Govt. has > been spending a ton of money on things that it can no longer > afford. I'm fairly pragmatic about this. I am employed by a > Defense Contractor, I know where my bread is buttered, but we as > a company have lost money so Uncle Sam could divert more and > more funds to support the war effort. I'm up here in MA > building Warships for the US Navy, but we're running a skeleton > crew and barely able to keep the lights on. How much extra have > all of you kicked-in to pay for the war you all supported so > much? Yea, I thought so...lets all pack our bags and move to > Guatemala. I don't understand this philosophy. For the > past seven years, the USA has undertaken a great campaign > against Global Terrorism, and wrung-up a huge tab to provide for > our nation's security. The Govt., as a result, has gotten > larger in-response to this threat. This was seen, seven years > ago, as a necessity to > chase and defend against Bin Ladin and his ilk. We-the- > People were all on-board with this plan then...The bill for > all of this will be paid......when??? > > Love to all, > > Michael > > > > --- On Wed, 11/12/08, Charles Perry <charles [at] carolina- > sound.com> wrote: > > From: Charles Perry <charles [at] carolina-sound.com> > Subject: RE: [Ferrari] "Economics" > To: cavallino_rapante [at] yahoo.com > Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> > Date: Wednesday, November 12, 2008, 6:37 PM > > Mike - > > When did you become such a flaming liberal? Do you need rescuing > from the > Northeast? We will help you!! > > Ric is dead on with all of this. It's not the Pickens or the > Buffetts that > are suffering from this incessant taxation - it's me! Last year, after > paying well into six figures in Federal taxes throughout the > year, I found out > in April that I owed another $4,000 in Federal taxes thanks to > the Alternative > Minimum Tax (AMT) - originally a "soak the rich" tax which is now > affecting millions of upper middle class families like mine. > > You know me - you've been to my house - you know my lifestyle. I > am not > wallowing in money, and $4k still means a helluva lot to me. > Yes, I own some > nice cars, but the youngest of which is 10 years old now - I'm > not in the > "pay an extra $100k for a 599 to be first in SC" club. For me to pay > that incremental $4k, my company has to make an extra $10k in > profit to pay that > to me. For that to happen, we have to sell another $40,000 in > goods and > services. Each of the four members of my family is in the same > position, so our > company has to sell another $160,000 in goods and services JUST > TO PAY THE AMT - > never mind the oppressive regular tax. > > There are millions of small businesses that don't gross $160k in > a year, > let alone make that just to "allow" their principles to pay AMT. > Furthermore, if we had that extra $40k in profit that we have to > use to use for > AMT to use for something else, I would hire someone to reduce my > 110 hour work > week and give me some time with my family. That would be me > CREATING A JOB - > just like the Dems always claim to want to do. But that job will > never exist > because of the AMT. And for every new tax that is heaped upon me > because I work > hard and am therefore "unspeakably wealthy," that is one LESS > job that > I will create and that much less my company can do to keep the > economy moving. > > Worse, my parents are paying thousands of dollars a month in > life insurance > premiums to provide a policy that will pay the Death Tax on the > value of this > business when they die, so that the government doesn't force my > brother and > I to sell the company that our family has worked decades to > build so that the > Dems can give half of it to some people who chose not to build > anything for > themselves. > > This is really, really, simple stuff and I KNOW you are this > smart. I, for one, > am definitely crying... > > -- charles > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael James [mailto:cavallino_rapante [at] yahoo.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 2:33 PM > To: Charles Perry > Cc: The FerrariList > Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Are Ferraris Losing Their Good Looks? > > > For me, its a waste of bandwidth to 'come to the aid' of folks who > don't seem to want or need defending. Every time I read of T.Boon > Picken's exploits, he's made another $100 Million, he certainly > isn't looking for a shoulder to cry on > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/philville%40dejaz zd.com > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ Philip "Phil" Tegtmeier 39 Churchill Drive Elverson Pa 19520 610.525.8949 And, go to: ... www.PhilvilleUSA.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/rich355%40comcast.net Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
- Re: "Economics", (continued)
-
Re: "Economics" Steve Jenkins, November 13 2008
-
Re: "Economics" Hans E. Hansen, November 13 2008
- Re: "Economics" Steve Jenkins, November 13 2008
-
Re: "Economics" Hans E. Hansen, November 13 2008
-
[No Ferrari] "Economics" un founded rumor department alert. philville dejazzd.com, November 14 2008
- Re: [No Ferrari] "Economics" un founded rumor departmentalert. Rich, November 14 2008
- Re: [No Ferrari] "Economics" un founded rumordepartmentalert. jashburne, November 14 2008
- Re: [No Ferrari] "Economics" un founded rumor department alert. Larry B, November 14 2008
-
Re: "Economics" Steve Jenkins, November 13 2008
- Re: "Economics" Ric Rainbolt, November 15 2008
- Re: "Economics" Ric Rainbolt, November 15 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.