Re: Cam timing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: clyde romero (clyderomero![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 21:46:04 -0800 (PST) |
The fact that you bought a VEGA says it all! Clyde Capt. Clyde Romero Jr. Manpad SME Clyderomero [at] worldnet.att.net Mobile 678 641 9932 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 2510-2521, and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium please so advise the sender immediately. Electronic Transmission Security Notice: E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of the message that arise as a result of its electronic (e-mail) transmission. -----Original Message----- From: Hans E. Hansen [mailto:FList [at] hanshansen.org] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 12:39 AM To: clyde Cc: The FerrariList Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Cam timing My 1st personal cam timing experience was on - of all things - a 1972 Chev Vega. The Vega had a very large cam sprocket that was easily removable. It only had one cam index hole, but I figured out how to drill some new holes progressively off a few degrees for each one. I thought this was pretty smart for a 16 year old. Anyway, cam timing is a bit counter-intuitive. I was trying to increase top end power. I rotated the wrong way and ended up with a real stump puller. Wouldn't rev to 4000rpm I left it that way because it would do some real righteous burn outs. Hans. > > An issue we haven't discussed at all but is important, is that the factory > marks that happen to be there, if any factory marks are present, are a > best-case 'recommendation'. Like everything else in an engine, valve timing > is a compromise. To make a car perform at its maximum potential at 7000rpm > means that you probably couldn't get it to idle below 2000 rpm! This is why > they invented the word "drivability". And of course, that's why the most > modern cars have variable cam timing. My '98 M-B SL500 had variable > exhaust cams but they just had two end-member states, switching over at > about 4400rpm - and you could feel it switch. My new C300 has continuously > variable intake and exhaust cams and modulates valve timing continuously. > That way the car takes advantage of the fluid (charge and exhaust) dynamics > at all engine speeds and all loads - while honoring the limits of fuel > economy and emissions (read: still a compromise). > > So this all begs the question; What is the right cam timing for your 308? > The answer is going to be in the definition of "right". Do you want it set > the way Enzo put it, for the market to which it was delivered? Or do you > want it to be smoothly drivable? Or do you want a top-end screamer with > drivability-be-damned? Or perhaps do you just want to pass the emissions > tests? Each definition of "right" will have a different valve timing > solution. And each setting is a compromise. > > Sorry for preaching to the choir but sometime folks (including me) get out > in the weeds and forget the fundamentals - not that any of us would do that. > > Woohoo, > > rick _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/clyderomero%40worldnet. att.net Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.13/1827 - Release Date: 12/3/2008 5:41 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.13/1827 - Release Date: 12/3/2008 5:41 PM
- Re: Cam timing, (continued)
- Re: Cam timing E M, December 3 2008
- Re: Cam timing Rick Lindsay, December 3 2008
- Re: Cam timing Steve Jenkins, December 3 2008
- Re: Cam timing Hans E. Hansen, December 3 2008
- Re: Cam timing clyde romero, December 3 2008
- Re: Cam timing Gary Reed, December 4 2008
- Re: Cam timing Steve Jenkins, December 4 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.