Re: stupidity of the press | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Dick Petrick (rtpetrick![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:13:27 -0800 (PST) |
Unc... Amen, pretty much! Dinger...thanks for your positive spin. It is refreshing, no doubt, and the way ahead is indeed long. The concern of many who will not receive "something for nothing" is that after the next 4 years, the way ahead may be longer than it is today. The new messiah (whose name may not be spoken) is a Harvard trained lawyer. I've often wondered why the mass intelligencia seems to believe that all lawyers are brilliant. I've never understood the phenomenon, and probably never will because I know many lawyers who seem to demonstrate the converse of the belief ....but then, I'm no one to make judgments. I am curious about whether or not you think it is brilliant to conduct Iranian negotiations without conditions....as the new messiah (whose name may not spoken) appears to think. Regards -----Original Message----- From: Ken Rentiers [mailto:rentiers [at] mac.com] Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 5:42 AM To: zavitar1 [at] yahoo.com Cc: red5hilser [at] aol.com; The FerrariList Subject: Re: [Ferrari] stupidity of the press On Jan 19, 2009, at 2:23 AM, La Dinger wrote: > Uncle Kenneth, Obama is crushing your wit. We look to you for > energy, ebulience, effervescence, exegetical enlightenment, and > exortation. You are becoming mean-spirited. Our Leader is brilliant. > You have to give him that. Just because other brilliant people (and > many Harvardites are far from brilliant , viz. our departing Leader) > just because THEY were bad does not mean Obama is also wicked. Be > not a slave to analogical syllogisms: they only demonstrate, never > prove. Summon up the blood. The way ahead is long. We must carry > ourselves with lofty sprits and hearts of controversy. A generous > spirit will be more inspiring. L. D. LD I have taken this off the Ferrari list because it ain't no place for this way off-topic stuff. Dunno why you think Obama is brilliant. I'll spot you charismatic, convincing campaigner, my problem lies with collectivist community organizer. All we know so far is he is good at getting elected. He did nothing of note in the Senate. Obama trumpets 'change' buts surrounds himself with liberal retreads from the Clinton cabinet. His longtime friends and associates are all card-carrying members of the Chicago corruptocracy, former domestic terrorists and race baiting fanatics. Ask yourself this: what would your assessment of BHO be if he were white? I repeat I have no problem with a man elected president who is black. I have a huge problem with a man elected president because he is black. What we have done is not change: it is as if one of Jimmy Carter's turds grew arms and legs and became re-animated. Same old sixties mantra: liberalism, radical environmentalism and mass rejection of our core values and traditions all mixed in with a compelling economic ignorance and administrative incompetence. To be fair I was deeply disappointed by the simple shit who preceded BHO as POTUS as well. America, the greatest, most successful and generous society the world has ever seen. Land of the free. And we go out and elect a guy who wants it all to change. To hell with it, I'll let this stand on the f-list and take my lumps. uk
- Re: stupidity of the press, (continued)
-
Re: stupidity of the press Rich, January 19 2009
- Re: stupidity of the press ken rentiers, January 19 2009
- Re: stupidity of the press LarryT, January 19 2009
-
Re: stupidity of the press Ken Rentiers, January 19 2009
- Re: stupidity of the press Dick Petrick, January 19 2009
- Re: stupidity of the press LarryT, January 19 2009
- Re: stupidity of the press Dick Petrick, January 20 2009
- Re: stupidity of the press ken rentiers, January 20 2009
- Re: stupidity of the press Dick Petrick, January 20 2009
-
Re: stupidity of the press Rich, January 19 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.