Re: NFC: Comparing manual to auto trans on race track | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Michael James (cavallino_rapante![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:29:42 -0700 (PDT) |
Eh, everyone is 'in-love' with paddle-shift on the column now, it was only a matter of time before Porsche realized that F1-equipped Ferraris were whipping Porsche street cars through the gears regularly. P had to copy F as a matter of pride/business or lose market-share to the 'faster' car. Ferrari's system appears to be superior in shift-speed and development. Anyone who says different can please show me the Porsche-designed Formula 1 car with paddleshifts..... But I'm also to understand that Lambo, F and P 'semi-auto' trannies all have a 'full-auto' mode as well, where the car requires no shifting input from the driver whatsoever and essentially operates like my Grandfather's Buick. This is why we now have the Nu-Money, Paris Hiltons of the world bipping around Hollywood in Italy's latest when just ten years ago none of these tools knew how to drive these cars.....progress ain't always a 'good' thing, no? M --- On Wed, 3/11/09, Fellippe Galletta <fellippe.galletta [at] gmail.com> wrote: From: Fellippe Galletta <fellippe.galletta [at] gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] NFC: Comparing manual to auto trans on race track To: "Michael" <Cavallino_Rapante [at] yahoo.com> Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Date: Wednesday, March 11, 2009, 1:55 AM On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Michael James <cavallino_rapante [at] yahoo.com>wrote: > I think the article might be misleading because the Tiptronic transmission, > I recall, required a semi-auto engagement of 'up' or 'down' via the > gearlever on the floor/console. This required the driver to remove their > hand from the wheel to shift, losing driver focus to fumble with a > narrow-gated lever out of the field of view. It is/was almost as bad > as Ferrari's Valeo system - we all know how successful THAT was. > > I also recall the driver not having full-use of the rev range of the engine > with the Tiptronic tranny, when the revs reached a certain value, the car > up/down shifted automatically regardless of driver intent as a matter of > preservation, so taking the car to max-revs before shifting > wasn't possible. I never saw a Tip-equipped Porsche do well on the re-sale > market, and everything I've read or heard about them from owners said 'shite > box'....YMMV. > > M > Mike, I'm with you on the hating of the porsche tiptronic and semi-autos in general....but the amount of new 911 turbos sold with this "PDK" transmission is staggering. I think it's something like 30-40%....a lot of people have them. FG _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/cavallino_rapante%40yahoo.com Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
-
NFC: Comparing manual to auto trans on race track Fellippe Galletta, March 10 2009
-
Re: NFC: Comparing manual to auto trans on race track Michael James, March 10 2009
- Re: NFC: Comparing manual to auto trans on race track Fellippe Galletta, March 10 2009
- Re: NFC: Comparing manual to auto trans on race track Michael James, March 10 2009
- Re: NFC: Comparing manual to auto trans on race track Fellippe Galletta, March 10 2009
-
Re: NFC: Comparing manual to auto trans on race track Brian E. Buxton, March 11 2009
- Re: NFC: Comparing manual to auto trans on race track Dan Warlick, March 11 2009
- Re: NFC: Comparing manual to auto trans on race track LarryT, March 12 2009
-
Re: NFC: Comparing manual to auto trans on race track Michael James, March 10 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.