Ferrari Mailing List: Re: Partial FC: Why top speed is so overrated...

[Dan Warlick (edwf430]

Because my friend, when you buy one, that's how your wallet feels 
afterwards.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "LS" <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com>
To: "Daniel" <edwf430 [at] att.net>
Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Partial FC: Why top speed is so overrated...


> The 599GTB and the GTR weigh the same as the early 1990s exotics? Maybe 
> their floormats!
>
> The Diablo was a disgusting fat pig at 3300lbs+, but the GTR and 599 blow 
> that figure into outer space.
>
> My question...how can Benz call their SL -"Sport Leicht" anymore? Doesn't 
> that mean super light in German?
>
> LS
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Fellippe Galletta <fellippe.galletta [at] gmail.com>
> To: LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com>
> Cc: The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 2:18:24 AM
> Subject: [Ferrari] Partial FC: Why top speed is so overrated...
>
> Just saw this video that really puts the whole top speed into total
> perspective:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEP3ew1MPXA
>
> Here you have 4 cars that couldn't be more different than each other and
> totally different price brackets all clock in between 195 and 201.5
> mph...Nissan GTR --> Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano. Talk about diminishing 
> returns
> to get an extra mph in top speed, lol.
>
> Horsepower has increased dramatically since 1990, yet top speeds have 
> barely
> gone up much. Allegedly supercars from back then could go more than 200, 
> but
> now I'm not so sure.
>
> My only explanation is that the newer cars have a lot more downforce and
> stability than the older cars at these speeds; weight is about the same,
> aerodynamic drag can't be much different, HP & Torque are a lot higher, so
> must be the downforce perhaps (or maybe the gearing too).
>
> F40, F50, and 550 Maranello all are supposedly in the 195 mph range as far
> as what they're clocked at, and the reports of their stability at those
> speeds have been nothing but phenomenal. I can't comment on the very 
> latest
> Vipers, Corvettes, but traditionally these cars are not rock steady at 
> very
> high speeds. Don't know about the 911 reputation, but don't think it's 
> quite
> at the level of supercar F or L.
>
> Which leads to the final point.... that is, all that should matter IMHO is
> the stability one feels flying at these supercar speeds. Given how long it
> takes to get to these speeds, I doubt very few people will ever be
> completely stress free going past the 300 km/hr zone. I've experienced 135
> mph in a few cars and it's quite apparent the dramatic difference between
> some of them....
>
> Most of this is trivial for many of us, but given the right supercar and a
> cross country trip, I know there are numerous roads where you can go flat
> out. It would be nice to experience 190 mph drama free for a sustained 
> 30-60
> seconds....
>
> Would like to hear some war stories!! Even more than flat out speeds, I'm
> interested to hear about highest average speeds for long
> distances.....averaging 130 mph for an hour or two would be impressive!
>
> FG
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/lashdeep%40yahoo.com
>
> Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
> and F1 Headlines
> http://www.F1Headlines.com/
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/edwf430%40att.net
>
> Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
> and F1 Headlines
> http://www.F1Headlines.com/