Partial FC: Why top speed is so overrated... | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fellippe Galletta (fellippe.galletta![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:18:27 -0700 (PDT) |
Just saw this video that really puts the whole top speed into total perspective: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEP3ew1MPXA Here you have 4 cars that couldn't be more different than each other and totally different price brackets all clock in between 195 and 201.5 mph...Nissan GTR --> Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano. Talk about diminishing returns to get an extra mph in top speed, lol. Horsepower has increased dramatically since 1990, yet top speeds have barely gone up much. Allegedly supercars from back then could go more than 200, but now I'm not so sure. My only explanation is that the newer cars have a lot more downforce and stability than the older cars at these speeds; weight is about the same, aerodynamic drag can't be much different, HP & Torque are a lot higher, so must be the downforce perhaps (or maybe the gearing too). F40, F50, and 550 Maranello all are supposedly in the 195 mph range as far as what they're clocked at, and the reports of their stability at those speeds have been nothing but phenomenal. I can't comment on the very latest Vipers, Corvettes, but traditionally these cars are not rock steady at very high speeds. Don't know about the 911 reputation, but don't think it's quite at the level of supercar F or L. Which leads to the final point.... that is, all that should matter IMHO is the stability one feels flying at these supercar speeds. Given how long it takes to get to these speeds, I doubt very few people will ever be completely stress free going past the 300 km/hr zone. I've experienced 135 mph in a few cars and it's quite apparent the dramatic difference between some of them.... Most of this is trivial for many of us, but given the right supercar and a cross country trip, I know there are numerous roads where you can go flat out. It would be nice to experience 190 mph drama free for a sustained 30-60 seconds.... Would like to hear some war stories!! Even more than flat out speeds, I'm interested to hear about highest average speeds for long distances.....averaging 130 mph for an hour or two would be impressive! FG
-
Partial FC: Why top speed is so overrated... Fellippe Galletta, March 16 2009
-
Re: Partial FC: Why top speed is so overrated... LS, March 17 2009
- Re: Partial FC: Why top speed is so overrated... Dan Warlick, March 17 2009
- Re: Partial FC: Why top speed is so overrated... philville dejazzd.com, March 17 2009
- Re: Partial FC: Why top speed is so overrated... Michael James, March 17 2009
-
Re: Partial FC: Why top speed is so overrated... LS, March 17 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.