Re: Sexiest looking red Ferrari?
From: clyde romero (clyderomeroworldnet.att.net)
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 15:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
I agree with Charles


            
  
Clyde
 
Capt. Clyde Romero Jr.
Manpad SME
Clyderomero [at] worldnet.att.net
Mobile 678 641 9932
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (including attachments) is covered by
the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U. S. C., Sections 2510-2521,
and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed, and
may contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure, dissemination, copying, forwarding or distribution is
prohibited. 
If you are not the intended recipient contact the sender by reply e-mail and
destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended
recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium
please so advise the sender immediately.
Electronic Transmission Security Notice: E-mail transmission cannot be
guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender does not accept liability
for any errors or omissions in the contents of the message that arise as a
result of its electronic (e-mail) transmission.
 
 
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Perry [mailto:charles [at] carolina-sound.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 6:34 PM
To: clyde
Cc: The FerrariList
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Sexiest looking red Ferrari?

I do like the Testarossa nose better than the 512TR, which is a little
less classic in my opinion. The 512TR does have the most beautiful
Ferrari wheels of all time, which is probably a big part of why I like
the nearly identical 355s as well. Clearly the TR interior is pretty
dated looking at this time, but I think the dark lower portions on the
exterior make the car look considerably more sleek - almost floating on
its wheels.

Ambivalent about the darker decklids on 512TR, but many owners have made
those body-colored, which says something.

The F512M was stylistic excess. I could maybe have dealt with the
exposed headlights, and I kind of like the rear taillight treatment, but
the wheels and NACA ducts were just precursors to modern bling.

-- charles
 
_______________________________________________

Charles G Perry IV
Vice-President, Engineering
 
Carolina Sound Communications - MuzaK
7630 Southrail Road, BLDG B
N. Charleston, SC 29420 
(843) 571-4488         www.carolina-sound.com
_______________________________________________
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Stark [mailto:MStark [at] Copper.net] 
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 6:15 PM
To: Charles Perry
Cc: The FerrariList
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] Sexiest looking red Ferrari?

In two words .... stylistic excess.   The 512TR is a bit dimensionally 
reined in.

Larry B wrote:

>I may be biased, but am genuinely interested: you really prefer, 
>aesthetically, the Testarossa to the 512TR?  (Don't worry, I don't take

>this personally.)
>
> 
>
>Larry
>
>512TR
> 
>Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 18:01:14 -0400
> 
> Twins separated at birth.
> 
> Charles Perry wrote:
> 
>Well, there are certainly lots of BEAUTIFUL red Ferraris, but since you

>said SEXIEST, it has to be the Testarossa...
>_________________________________________________________________
>To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
>http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/mstark%40copper.ne
>t
>
>Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
>and F1 Headlines
>http://www.F1Headlines.com/
>
>  
>
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/charles%40carolina-
sound.com

Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/clyderomero%40worldnet.
att.net

Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com 
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.325 / Virus Database: 270.12.17/2095 - Release Date: 05/04/09
17:51:00

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.