Re: Sexiest looking red Ferrari? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Larry B (larrybard![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:53:21 -0700 (PDT) |
Nice diplomatic response, and all good points, as usual. Interestingly, one of the reasons I prefer the 512TR is because I don't care for the lower black trim on the TR; I strongly prefer the 512TR's more integrated look (though I admit it makes it appear somewhat less sleek). Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:29:44 -0700 I think an early TR with a slightly updated wheel size would trump the 512TR personally. The black lower trim on the TR and the early 348s is highly desirable as it makes the shape sleeker and lightens it up considerably. Also, the early TR's rear buttresses terminate before the end of the engine cover and then gently kick back up for a slight "spoiler" look. The 512TR's extend all the way to the edge of the engine cover which isn't as sexy in my opinion. Both are hot!!
- Re: Sexiest looking red Ferrari?, (continued)
- Re: Sexiest looking red Ferrari? clyde romero, May 4 2009
- Re: Sexiest looking red Ferrari? Erik Nielsen, May 4 2009
- Re: Sexiest looking red Ferrari? Charles Perry, May 4 2009
- Re: Sexiest looking red Ferrari? LS, May 4 2009
- Re: Sexiest looking red Ferrari? Larry B, May 4 2009
- Ferrari 250 SWB Misc, May 4 2009
- Re: Sexiest looking red Ferrari? Fellippe Galletta, May 4 2009
- Re: Sexiest looking red Ferrari? Brian E. Buxton, May 4 2009
- Re: Sexiest looking red Ferrari? Martin Stark, May 4 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.