Re: New Physics is not going to save us | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: philville dejazzd.com (philville![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:43:40 -0700 (PDT) |
I wonder what Georges obsession with in line 6's is, maybe he is trying to send us a coded message...just maybe that good ole Blue Flame can get the job done? OR, coud it be a Twin H? Talk about torque! I can see the salvation of GM, a Blue Flame 6 in every garage, ----- Original Message ----- From: Dan Warlick <edwf430 [at] att.net> Date: Friday, May 22, 2009 10:34 am Subject: Re: [Ferrari] New Physics is not going to save us To: Phil Tegtmeier <philville [at] dejazzd.com> Cc: ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com > Ummmmmm...........YEAH!!! WHAT HE SAID!!!!!............... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <georgedodson [at] comcast.net> > To: "Daniel" <edwf430 [at] att.net> > Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 6:21 AM > Subject: [Ferrari] New Physics is not going to save us > > > > All, > > > > Sorry, I am a day or two behind in my reading. If anyone on > the list is > > waiting for some "new physics" to come along and provide a new > energy > > source, they need to take a cold shower. Physics research is > at least 50 > > to 100 years ahead of applicable technology. > Quarks and lattice quantum > > chromodynamics are not going to hellp. The most advanced > energy sources > > now and on the horizon are the breeder reactor and > plasma fusion. both > > from the 1950's. If you think that wind and solar are going to > save you, > > then you need to wake up and look a the power density numbers. > Solar is ~ > > 1kw/meter square at noon at the equator. Multiply that tines > ~3% > > efficiency and you cover Rhode Island with solar cells to > equal one nuke. > > A wind tower has about as much power as an inline six > cylinder. Greenpeace > > will sue you if you try to put one on a scenic mountain and > Ted Kennedy > > will oppose you putting one up where he likes to sail his $1- > 2M racing > > yachts. So, what are you going to do? Plasma fusion is still > 30 years away > > from an operable power reactor, even with ITER, and where is > this mountain > > of Tritium that you are planng to burn? the only answer is a > Li blanket > > around a reactor, so why nor run reactors. Power > reactors have Avogadro's > > number of atoms in less than a thimble and produce 200 > MeV/fission. Plasma > > fusion runs in what most people would see as a pretty good > vacuum and D-T > > produces only ~20 Mev/fusion. It has the energy density of, > you guessed > > it, an inline 6 cylinder. Then there is the small problem of > containing > > the Sun 3 meters from something that you can fabricate in the > lab. The > > French are 80% nuclear, they have a breeder program and > reprocess all the > > nuchear fuel rods in Europe. There isn't even enough Uranium > on the planet > > for the electricity that we need. We need breeder reactors and > we need > > them now. > > > > Regards, > > > > George > > _________________________________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > > > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/edwf430%40att.net > > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > > and F1 Headlines > > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/philville%40dejaz zd.com > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/ Philip "Phil" Tegtmeier 39 Churchill Drive, Elverson Pa 19520 610.525.8949 Save these dates: September 12th & 13th 100 Motorcars of Radnor Hunt fantastic 2 day event ......www.radnorconcours.org ........ _________________________________________ September the 27th Garden State Ferrari Fall Festival __________________________________________ And of course, go to: ................www.PhilvilleUSA.com
-
New Physics is not going to save us georgedodson, May 22 2009
-
Re: New Physics is not going to save us Dan Warlick, May 22 2009
- Re: New Physics is not going to save us philville dejazzd.com, May 27 2009
-
Re: New Physics is not going to save us Dan Warlick, May 22 2009
- Re: New Physics is not going to save us LarryT, May 22 2009
- Re: New Physics is not going to save us Paul Bennett, May 22 2009
- Re: New Physics is not going to save us Martin Stark, May 23 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.