Re: Insurance--cheap is not necessarily better | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Doug and Terri Anderson (dnt![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:43:50 -0700 (PDT) |
Good points Robert.As an old Dept of Insurance Market Conduct examiner - my meager advice is ALWAYS make sure your company is licensed to do business in your state. As in Kalifornia, it is NOT against the law to sell insurance, any type, if the company is not licensed in Kalifornia. So your state likewise may not prevent off-shore companies from selling in your state. Why? If you EVER have a tiff, who are you gonna sue? Gotta an off-shore company? Tough buns ace. I haven't seen it all, but cheap insurance blues is justa lurking around th' corner.
DOUG Have had USAA since 1973 and Haggerty.Oh - for your home? Don't forget Building Code Upgrade coverage. Especially if you have an early Cliff May, Joseph Eichler or Frank Lloyd Wright home. heh heh
----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Rehkopf" <CaptRehkopf [at] comcast.net>
To: "DOUG" <dnt [at] dock.net> Cc: "The FerrariList" <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 5:32 AM Subject: [Ferrari] Insurance--cheap is not necessarily better
I'm sure the List has had this discussion before but in reading today's posts about finding cheaper insurance it forced me to probably re-remind everyone that insurance i.e. insurance companies are only good if they 'stand with you' i.e. pay your claim! Matt Boyd's post was more to thepoint, he had a claim they paid, he was satisfied, they didn't cancel him atthe next renewal period, etc.I have USAA for everything except my new BMW R1100S motorcycle because USAA stopped insuring any additional motorcycles not currently insured. I shoppedaround for insurance for the first time in my adult life, cost is oneconsideration but there are more important considerations when selecting aninsurance company. I didn't go with the cheapest but I went with the company/Dairyland I thought, from talking with others that would pay anyclaim without hassle and not cancel me and not raise my rate too drasticallyif I had an accident. I learned the insurance lesson many years ago, from an attorney, ugh! Wewere selecting a contractor for a construction project and bonding came up, she said, she didn't care what company the contractors bond was with as long as it had a certain 'rating' , i.e. had the resources and reputation to pay claims. In these economic times this is more important than ever, there arefly by night bonding companies, etc. popping up charging less money but without any ability or intent to pay off. Be careful if the deals too good as they say. My2cents. 1988.5 328 GTS Red/Tan still looking for a good home. Robert _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/dnt%40dock.net Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines http://www.F1Headlines.com/
-
Insurance--cheap is not necessarily better Robert Rehkopf, September 16 2009
- Re: Insurance--cheap is not necessarily better Doug and Terri Anderson, September 16 2009
-
Re: Insurance--cheap is not necessarily better John Allison, September 28 2009
- Re: Insurance--cheap is not necessarily better clyderomero, September 28 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.