Re: Need group wisdom on pricing for 2007 F430
From: Brian E. Buxton (bebbmisigecom.net)
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 13:28:58 -0800 (PST)
But you're saying that a patek isn't valuable and that they market poorly because *you* don't recognize them.

Brian E. Buxton
Buxton Motorsports, Inc.
301 North Royal Ave.
Buxton Plaza
Evansville, IN 47715-2866

(812) 760-5513  mobile
(812) 476-2281 x 209  office
------------

Sent from my 3G Apple iPhone.




On Feb 7, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Erik Nielsen <judge4re [at] gmail.com> wrote:

But when you start getting to the stratosphere, the rarest of the
rare, most people don't recognize things.  Real Bugattis look like old
cars at this point to most, Vermeer's are typically small scale
paintings with soft lighting and "mundane" subjects.

But then again, I expect Ferrari Bubba, even in East Jesus Arkansas to
look at a Type 35C and say "cool"...



On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Mike Fleischer <themightytoe [at] gmail.com> wrote:
OK

Good points I guess, and I suppose watch collectors should be no
different (but like I said, I hardly ever wear a watch, haven't since my
first cellphone that fit in my pocket).  And while most folks can
recognize a Picasso or a Ferrari or a Rolex, I can honestly say a Patek
Phillipe does not rank in recognizability.  It just doesn't, poor
marketing no question but there it is?  Now that said its a handsome
looking watch, no question, but Its still only a watch... It lacks that
vroom vroom ness.

I think PT Barnum sums up my feelings on a million dollar watch (and
those who would insure it for that...)... But if you get enough folks all believing in the value of something then I guess I get left in the minority, and won't go to those churches on Sunday even if they do have
the nicest biggest screen TV's...




Brian E. Buxton wrote:
Problem is your looking at it as if it were only a watch.  Or at a
Picasso as only a painting.  Or a $10,000 Hot Wheels as a kids toy.
At that level it's an investment.  Something rare and valuable that
will appreciate.  Something better than a stock 1. because it's
insured and if destroyed, you will at least break even on it (or make
$); 2. it's something you can enjoy and use while you own it; and 3.
it's something that will be valued by others in the future and will

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.