Re: F1 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Mike Fleischer (themightytoe![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:23:29 -0800 (PST) |
No I disagree, its a been there done that, got the t-shirt thing. The problem here is that they are making these moves arbitrarily... Its not to make the sport better.... Or to be "state of the art" If they wanted cutting edge of new engine tech? Why go back to a low displacement 4 banger with a turbo? This is like a turbo Hayabusa motor... I say go to a formula of here is the displacement rules, here they are if you super charge, here they are if you turbo charge, here they are if you go hybrid, anything else clever you can come up with is free power to win the season. And let the contenders develop the engines. Freezing that critical bit of the equation during the season pretty much locks it up for whoever wins the first few races. No one is driving around on the street with an 18000 RPM engine in their car with unrestricted exhausts... ITs a race car, stop trying to take it back to the street, it doesn't fit. Hell I tried driving my spec Miata to work once... That wasn't pleasant. On 12/10/2010 7:14 PM, Thomas Reynolds wrote:
|
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.