Re: Porsche 911 GT3 Recall (NFC)
From: Larry T (l02turnercomcast.net)
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
re the early 996 (and Boxster BTW) had IMS and RMS problems.
IMS = Intermediate Shaft
RMS = Rear Main Seal

Sincerely,
Larry

On 3/20/2014 2:13 PM, Erik Nielsen wrote:
Weren't there issues with the 996 first gen engines? Didn't the last generation GT3 also have issues? 47 years of screwing around with it and they still haven't gotten it right...


On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:55 PM, LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com <mailto:lashdeep [at] yahoo.com>> wrote:

    FG, it's not like Porsche is known for engineering or design. So
    we can let it slide?

    :)

    You guys are being too understanding about this.

    The car is under warranty and should be repaired to the customer's
    satisfaction.

    It's not even numbers matching anymore...HAHA!


    LS




    /*central */
    /*wines-spirits   est 1934
    */
    /*
    */
    /*625 e street nw
    */
    /*washington, dc 20004*/
    /*
    */
    /*centralwines.com <http://centralwines.com/>
    */
    /*
    */
    /*facebook.com/CentralLiquors <http://facebook.com/CentralLiquors>
    */
    /*
    */
    /*202-737-2800 <tel:202-737-2800>*/



    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *From:* Fellippe Galletta <fellippe.galletta [at] gmail.com
    <mailto:fellippe.galletta [at] gmail.com>>
    *To:* LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com <mailto:lashdeep [at] yahoo.com>>
    *Cc:* The FerrariList <ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com
    <mailto:ferrari [at] ferrarilist.com>>
    *Sent:* Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:02 PM

    *Subject:* Re: [Ferrari] Porsche 911 GT3 Recall (NFC)

    I'd  hate to have been the lead Engineer overseeing the 991 GT3
    platform.

    He may never experience the potential personal liability risk that
    your average PE undertakes, but holy crap.....he just lost $2.5
    billion for Porsche over a minor detail!

    Gotta give Porsche credit here.....they manned up on this one.
    They coulda went Ford Pinto here and taken the road that they'll
    probably never have to settle for $2.5 billion in claims.....from
    a typical corporation dollars and cents point of view, its what
    you would expect.

    They'll make it up eventually, and all will be well.

    FG



    On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Adam Green <FlatCrank [at] gmail.com
    <mailto:FlatCrank [at] gmail.com>> wrote:

        I've pasted the whole letter text, below, for anyone a curious
        fascination in corporate-double-speak customer communiques.  I
        find them to be laughably trivial and insincere; they make
        matters less tolerable.

        I extracted the salient passage as

            /Analysis has revealed that in both cases the engine
            damage was caused by a loosened piston rod screw
            connection which damaged the crankcase. In order to avoid
            this in the future, an optimized screw connection is
            currently being tested. /


        There's a thing called a gudgeon pin, or wrist pin, connecting
        the piston to the rod, and there's the "big end" which is the
        end of the connecting rod (maybe also called a "piston" rod" I
        guess) wrapped around the crank.  The titanium con rod is a
        fully formed, single piece, single forged items which is (or
        at least the technique used to be) cracked apart then
        machined, balanced and paired in "boxer" reciprocating
        assemblies, then the three pairs are balanced with the crank
        and pistons as a single rotating assembly.  It's a robotic
        assembly process with only a few human steps.  I've not seen
        or read about the newest 9000 rpm redline engines, but I
        imagine they continue the march towards a fully mechanized
        assembly.  In any case, there is no "screw connection" but I
        guess that's meant to be "accessible" language for vehicle
        owners who think of the 'engine' as a part to be wholly
        replaced when it goes bang.  Fair enough. : )  Well, after
        all, that's how the race teams do it, right?

        I'm somewhat astonished by a failure at this point of the
        engine internals and I wonder if it reflects some break-down
        in the transition from development units to production units.
         This doesn't seem to be a materials, quality or assembly
        process, but a design flaw requiring the entire unit be
        replaced holus bolus.  Surely this is the most expensive way,
        but Porsche has, years ago, gone to a policy of replacing
        whole assemblies (a whole transmission is replaced, complete
        in the transaxle, rather than a field tech performing even
        moderately simple rebuilding tasks.)  It's sad to see Porsches
        and Ferraris becoming vehicles that, well, will future
        generations of car enthusiasts be restricted to a laptop for
        their shadetree mechanic exploits? /"Oh wow, you guys, check
        out the 3D map I just flashed onto my ignition curves!"/



        Adam

            Dear Mr. Green:
            As advised previously, engineers at Porsche AG have been
            conducting technical analysis of the Porsche 911GT3 engine
            in order to find a solution to the problem which led us to
            recommend you stop driving your car.
            This analysis is now completed, and we would like to
            inform you about the cause of the problem and the planned
            remedial actions.
            As already communicated, two vehicles in Europe suffered
            engine damage, causing the vehicles to catch fire.
            Analysis has revealed that in both cases the engine damage
            was caused by a loosened piston rod screw connection which
            damaged the crankcase. In order to avoid this in the
            future, an optimized screw connection is currently being
            tested. For the final validation of this solution,
            Porsche AG is currently carrying out extensive tests.
            At Porsche we are rigorous when implementing an
            engineering solution, therefore, after the successful
            testing and validation we will be installing *new
            engines* with optimized piston rod screw connections in
            *all 2014* Porsche911 GT3 vehicles.
            Due to the complexity of the necessary arrangement, we are
            currently unable to provide you with a specific workshop
            date for your Porsche 911 GT3. We will be arranging an
            appointment with you individually, as soon as the
            logistics planning is finalized. We will be providing you
            with additional information within the next three weeks.
            We continue to remain committed to supporting your
            individual needs during this time. Your personal contact
            person will make contact with you within the next days to
            discuss individual solutions to bridge the gap until you
            are reunited with your Porsche 911 GT3.
            Thank you very much for your patience and your loyalty to
            the Porsche brand.

            Kind regards,

        On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Martin Stark
        <mstark [at] copper.net <mailto:mstark [at] copper.net>> wrote:

            Just a guess, but perhaps it's a locking tab that was
            poorly set and flexed off.


            On 3/18/2014 7:30 PM, Hans E. Hansen wrote:
            That recall says the problem is a "loose fastener" on
            a connecting rod bouncing around inside the engine.

            I'd think if you lost a rod nut, the nut itself would be
            the least of your problems......

            Hans.


            On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:47 PM, LS <lashdeep [at] yahoo.com
            <mailto:lashdeep [at] yahoo.com>> wrote:


                WTH

                
http://autos.yahoo.com/blogs/motoramic/porsche-fixes-fire-prone-911-gt3s-with-free-engine-replacements-220849413.html

                A few months ago I wrote:

                "I would say that your quandary of 930 based 911 GT3
                (even without a clutch pedal) and the Corvette for
                long term reliability is probably the only valid one
                out there. I would not want to put any other
                manufacturers into that gamble..."

                I would like to officially retract that statement.

                Thanks,
                LS





                /*central */
                /*wines-spirits est 1934
                */
                /*
                */
                /*625 e street nw
                */
                /*washington, dc 20004*/
                /*
                */
                /*centralwines.com <http://centralwines.com/>
                */
                /*
                */
                /*facebook.com/CentralLiquors
                <http://facebook.com/CentralLiquors>
                */
                /*
                */
                /*202-737-2800*/



                
_________________________________________________________________
                To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options,
                please visit:
                
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/flist%40hanshansen.org

                Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
                and F1 Headlines
                http://www.F1Headlines.com/ <http://www.f1headlines.com/>




            _________________________________________________________________
            To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options,
            please visit:
            
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/mstark%40copper.net

            Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com and F1 Headlines
            http://www.F1Headlines.com/ <http://www.f1headlines.com/>


            _________________________________________________________________
            To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please
            visit:
            
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/flatcrank%40gmail.com



            Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
            and F1 Headlines
            http://www.F1Headlines.com/ <http://www.f1headlines.com/>



        _________________________________________________________________
        To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
        
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/fellippe.galletta%40gmail.com

        Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
        and F1 Headlines
        http://www.F1Headlines.com/ <http://www.f1headlines.com/>



    _________________________________________________________________
    To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
    http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/lashdeep%40yahoo.com



    Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
    and F1 Headlines
    http://www.F1Headlines.com/ <http://www.f1headlines.com/>



    _________________________________________________________________
    To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
    http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/judge4re%40gmail.com

    Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
    and F1 Headlines
    http://www.F1Headlines.com/




_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/l02turner%40comcast.net

Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com
and F1 Headlines
http://www.F1Headlines.com/

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.