Re: auction | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fellippe Galletta (fellippe.galletta![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 23:38:22 -0700 (PDT) |
On 9/7/14, clyde romero <clyderomerof4 [at] bellsouth.net> wrote: > I am watching the auction of muscle cars > > Stupid money > > For stupid cars I sorta agree/disagree.... Muscle cars are great, but I never could rationalize them being worth megabucks. I guess we could dismiss them as one trick ponies, but then maybe we could do the same for vintage 250 series Ferraris that couldn't handle or brake much better. So we're putting on our red colored glasses and showing a bias for exotics over muscle -- which I fully endorse. Just look at a 250 SWB or 275 GTB....gorgeous and much classier looking interior. Now a Cuda, Chevelle, Pontiac GTO are nice looking too in that muscle way but not the same. So I'm ok with "elite" muscle going for 100-200k perhaps, but this $500k-$1M+ is insane. IIRC there may have been a $2 or $3M Cuda sold....an extremely rare 1 of 5, convertible with manual, etc. Silly. Like the 250 GTO version of muscle. The good news for muscle is that you can get more or less the same cars for a whole lot less if you're not obsessed with #s matching crap, original this and that. There's no real stigma to doing modifications and what not to these cars so long as you don't take them to the big auction houses. I believe one could get a "normal" muscle car for $50-60k these days (less probably) and do what they want. A far cry for a vintage Ferrari. FG
- Re: auction, (continued)
- Re: auction Erik Nielsen, September 6 2014
- Re: auction Robert W. Garven Jr., September 6 2014
- Re: auction John Ashburne, September 6 2014
- Re: auction Robert W. Garven Jr., September 7 2014
- Re: auction Fellippe Galletta, September 6 2014
-
Re: auction Clyde Romero, September 7 2014
- Re: auction Fellippe Galletta, September 7 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.