Re: 456 issues | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: David (david![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:25:43 -0700 (PDT) |
Window ECUs suck and are NLA, fuel pump assemblies are
crap and components are NLA (pump is available, but is useless without the
various rubber bits to mount it in the tank), seat ECUs are NLA, and the list
goes on. It isn't that the parts are expensive (they are), it's that they just
aren't available.
Engine wise both cars are pretty good, but with the 456 prices
so low, there is usually a lot of deferred maintenance - just like 308s a few
years ago.
456M is the preferred option, but has the exact same issues as
a regular 456. 550 is a much better bet but still suffers fuel pump issues with no
parts available.
Remember, there is no such
thing as a cheap Ferrari - purchase price is only the
beginning.
HTH,
Dave
From: Ferrari [mailto:ferrari-bounces+david=tynerroberts.com [at] ferrarilist.com] On Behalf Of Fellippe Galletta
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 5:33 AM
To: David
Cc: The FerrariList
Subject: [Ferrari] 456 issues
A coworker asked me about the 456, and I told him it's a wonderful
value for a modern V12 F.
Just that it has a few potential issues that could quickly add up to the
price of the car, hehe.
So what were they exactly?
I remember something about the windows, maybe windshield too. Also the auto
trans could be an expensive rebuild (but nobody wants an auto 456!).
I can't imagine it would be too bad.
Looking at the V12 universe, it looks to be a good value. Even better than
the Maranello possibly...
FG
- Re: 456 issues, (continued)
-
Re: 456 issues Doug & Terri, September 30 2014
- Re: 456 issues LarryT, September 30 2014
- Re: 456 issues Doug & Terri, September 30 2014
- Re: 456 issues Britt2Asa, September 30 2014
- Re: 456 issues David, September 30 2014
- Re: 456 issues Clyde Romero, September 30 2014
- Re: 456 issues LarryT, September 30 2014
-
Re: 456 issues Doug & Terri, September 30 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.