Re: F1 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Erik Nielsen (judge4re![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 08:18:54 -0800 (PST) |
I knew the NASCrap comment would get a rise. There is nothing wrong with motorsports from a competition standpoint, but when the big money gets involved, jeez what a mess. Pure test of skill occurs in a spec Miata or a shifter kart, higher budgets than that are just dick swinging contests. I don't buy into the whole brand lifestyle approach being pushed by Ferrari and the others (to some extent), it's just a form of a drug deal, got to get you hooked. Look at it from the outside and it's just sheep being shorn on a regular basis. As for cars, we're still early in this journey, the question is do we put the object on the pedestal or accept that its functionality is more important? I enjoy the technical elegance of a well executed design, but can really do without all of the cultural emotional baggage that comes with it. I leave you with just one more psychoanalysis tidbit for Sunday. Do you know what Sigmund Freud said comes between fear and sex? Funf. Cheers, Erik Sent from my iPad > On Nov 2, 2014, at 8:20 AM, Rick Lindsay <richardolindsay [at] gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Easy Rick, you're starting to sound like you're promoting NASCAR... > > Now you're just getting nasty! > > > The sport is no longer relevant > > The sport is no longer a 'sport'...as if it ever was. > > > I spend enough time on the continent to tell you that there is a limited > > audience there, too. Let it die a natural death and let's see what > > grows up to replace it. > > Probably good advice. Perhaps I'm just too old and want back 'the old ways', > as Miss Marple says. > > I wonder if our parents felt this same way, or is this unique? If so, is it a > game-changing mega-trend, as the cultural geographers say? In the '30s a > motorcar was a luxury and one needed to be a mechanic, or rich enough to > employ one, to operate the machine. By the '60, at least in the U.S., every > family owned a car and corner garages kept them running. By the '80s the > beasts were considered dirty and dangerous so multiple defenses were added. > In the 21st century, motorcars are questionably necessary major appliances > but owning one is an entitlement - like free government money, housing, food > stamp cards and healthcare. Oh, and high speed internet, smart phones and > tablets. Can't buy food or pay child support but they have a Facebook page! > Now THAT is a mega-trend. Our parents' generation may have been poor but they > prioritized food and child care first. > > Motorsport is dangerous so lots of protection has to be added. We seem to > have realized that civilization must be safe and our inate desire for carnage > and competition has to be satesfied elsewhere. How about a team (tribe) of > football players (warriers) egged on by fight songs and blood thirsty cheers, > competing on the field of battle for breeding rights over the cheerleaders?! > Yes! Natural Selection wins another one! Now if fantasy football could just > replace the actual games, perhaps with computer generated decisions, everyone > would be safer. Racers could compete on their smart phones - or if adequately > wealthy, have someone wiggle their thumbs for them. And in the end, award > double points for their entitled entertainment! > > > YMMV, > > Erik > > Indeed it does, Dr. Erik
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.