Re: SPOILER potential | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rick Moseley (ramosel![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:34:43 -0800 (PST) |
Ahhhhh HA!!! I don't drink coffee! Can't stand the stuff!!! But I'm on enough meds.... Point taken... <grin> > On Nov 23, 2014, at 6:16 AM, Erik Nielsen <judge4re [at] gmail.com> wrote: > > You guys actually think F1 is something more than a show? What's in your > coffee cups? > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Nov 23, 2014, at 8:07 AM, Rick Lindsay <richardolindsay [at] gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Yea, everyone gets a trophy. Pashaw! >> >> -------- Original message -------- >> From: Rick Moseley >> Date:11/23/2014 7:53 AM (GMT-06:00) >> To: Rick Lindsay >> Cc: The FerrariList >> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] SPOILER potential >> >> Agreed... And also up to early. >> >> The whole RBR wing thing reads poorly. So the stewards punish RBR because >> they "think" RBR is doing something wrong. The video confirms it but the F1 >> scrutineers aren't bright enough to come up with a static test to prove it. >> All this just kills initiative... But that seems to be the way of the world >> these days. Too many socialist ideals. >> >> >> >> >>> On Nov 23, 2014, at 5:37 AM, Rick Lindsay <richardolindsay [at] gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Those of you who really know me also know that despite having red cars in >>> the garage, I'm no more Tofosi than my mailman. I just love machines. Its >>> why i follow F1. So the message in my previous rant wasn't prompted by >>> sour-grapes. It came from disappointment with current rules of F1, and the >>> preferential enforcement if those rules. >>> >>> I put Ferrari's poor performance this season, down to the rule preventing >>> in-season engine development. Makes me ponder all the changes Renault did >>> after their disastrous season start. Hummm... >>> >>> Ferrari started with an engine lacking in performance, with no opportunity >>> permitted in-season to improve it, and continued a season of untested >>> radical chassis tweaks in the attempt to compensate. I only hope they have >>> learned a lot from these 'tests', that are applicable to next season. >>> >>> I also just hope someone in Formula 1 management comes to their senses >>> before marketing and political correctness pushes the series into bio-fuels >>> and gluten free tires! >>> >>> -rick >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -------- Original message -------- >>> From: John Ashburne >>> Date:11/23/2014 6:14 AM (GMT-06:00) >>> To: Rick Lindsay >>> Cc: The FerrariList >>> Subject: Re: [Ferrari] SPOILER potential >>> >>> Rick >>> >>> I agree, and I have been thinking the same thing about Leigh, David and >>> Steve. It must be making them ill to have to put on a smile and gush about >>> what an exciting season it has been. >>> >>> There is only so much interest in a close race between P3 and P10, and that >>> was because of the points. As the season dragged on, and it has dragged, >>> even that devolved to literally a handful of seconds in a race while the >>> pass was taking place that were truly interesting. A soccer game that ends >>> in a scoreless tie is about as interesting a way to waste 2 hours. >>> >>> I just shook my head a couple of races ago when they tried to create some >>> excitement in the "battle for P12" or some other meaningless spot in the >>> back of the field. >>> >>> Let's hope that someone figures out a way to return F1 to its place at the >>> pinnacle of racing. It sure ain't there now. >>> >>> John >>> >>> Sent from my ATT Bell Rotary Dial Phone >>> >>>> On Nov 23, 2014, at 6:58 AM, Rick Lindsay <richardolindsay [at] gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello Friends, >>>> >>>> I just read an extended article on Red Bull's flexible wing elements tests >>>> and the resulting grid penalties. What a load of prejudicial crap! I'd >>>> really like to know which fart-nugget steward or disgruntled engineer in a >>>> lower championship team, triggered the investigation! I mean, final >>>> position in the constructor's championship translates to money. Who >>>> benefits from ratting-out Red Bull for exploiting the >>>> letter-of-the-regulations, just like every other team?! Granted, Williams >>>> can't catch Red Bull in the constructor's ranking but that doesn't mean >>>> there isn't value to be gained elsewhere. Then again, the whole thing >>>> could be as simple as an over zealous steward wanting to feel important. >>>> >>>> I'm pretty happy that the stupid double-points thing isn't giving the >>>> championship to an undeserving driver. Bernie's whole issue was to >>>> randomize the last race to hold the TV audience, or at a minimum, to keep >>>> this waining sport in the media. Realistically, the championship is >>>> already won. A Mercedes driver will win it. Who cares which one?! They're >>>> equally talented in nicely matched outstanding cars. The prize is going to >>>> the participating company with the biggest and most experienced R&D >>>> department; the company with oodles of experience with turbo engines and >>>> hybrid configurations. I can't wait until Honda steps back in with what >>>> promises to be an outstanding power plant. Its just a shame that Audi >>>> doesn't build an F1 engine! >>>> >>>> So the season is ending and championships are all-but decided, unless the >>>> stewards choose to steal points for some implied infraction. I must admit >>>> that I'm pretty tired of my favorite TV announcers - Lee, David and Steve >>>> - telling me what a great season its been and what a great race today will >>>> be, as they try to infuse a little enthusiasm back into the process that >>>> pays their salaries. In contrast, Mark Weber has it right. Forget this >>>> rule-strangled and stage-managed series and move on to sports car racing. >>>> And at a minimum, let us also move on to next year and hope for a less >>>> boring, management-meddling season. >>>> >>>> Your mileage may certainly vary. >>>> >>>> -rick, up way too early >>>> _________________________________________________________________ >>>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: >>>> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/jashburne%40aol.com >>>> >>>> Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com >>>> and F1 Headlines >>>> http://www.F1Headlines.com/ >>> _________________________________________________________________ >>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: >>> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/ramosel%40pacbell.net >>> >>> Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com >>> and F1 Headlines >>> http://www.F1Headlines.com/ >> _________________________________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: >> http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/judge4re%40gmail.com >> >> Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com >> and F1 Headlines >> http://www.F1Headlines.com/ > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.ferrarilist.com/mailman/options/ferrari/ramosel%40pacbell.net > > Sponsored by BooyahMedia.com > and F1 Headlines > http://www.F1Headlines.com/
- Re: SPOILER potential, (continued)
-
Re: SPOILER potential Rick Lindsay, November 23 2014
- Re: SPOILER potential Rick Moseley, November 23 2014
-
Re: SPOILER potential Rick Lindsay, November 23 2014
-
Re: SPOILER potential Erik Nielsen, November 23 2014
- Re: SPOILER potential Rick Moseley, November 23 2014
- Re: SPOILER potential John Ashburne, November 23 2014
-
Re: SPOILER potential Erik Nielsen, November 23 2014
-
Re: SPOILER potential Rick Lindsay, November 23 2014
-
Re: SPOILER potential Rick Lindsay, November 23 2014
- Re: SPOILER potential Erik Nielsen, November 23 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.