F1/Alonso/etc (possible spoiler) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jim Conforti (lndshrk![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:15:31 -0700 (PDT) |
Guys,
Simply put, one of three things happened.
1) The engine was faulty from the get-go.
I leave the determination of which to the reader.
Jim
Some of you are giving far too much credit to the F1 engineers and engine builders. They *cannot* predict when an engine will fail. They can only build one, test it on the dyno or track and if it fails say "well, we need to improve xxxx". Engine development is much more an iterative process than it is someone sitting at a workstation running some software and calculating all the answers. Ricardo (sellers of some VERY expensive design software) would like you believe otherwise, of course. ;)
The 'science' of engine building - even with supercomputer simulation - is still more of an 'art' than a science.
Some of my good friends are in the F1 engine programs of various concerns - one even LEAD one of the OEM's F1 programs a few years back when they were winning.
They can predict how many revs/miles bearings will take to create xx deformation, but cannot say that the engine will fail at xx deformation - that's "the noise" as Rick Lindsay so correctly put it.
Simply put, one of three things happened.
1) The engine was faulty from the get-go.
2) The engine was operated in the "noise" region. The region of uncertainty - that was a calculated gamble by their team and Briatore should shut up before someone spanks him and sends him to bed w/o his teenage supermodel.
3) God/Allah/Yaweh/Insert your deity here or maybe even Satan decided that Michael and Ferrari should win at Monza. Divine intervention - unless you happen to be Alonso or Briatore. <snicker>
I leave the determination of which to the reader.
Jim
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.