Re: [NFC] 2003 BMW M5? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Brian E. Buxton (BrianBuxton![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:54:20 -0700 (PDT) |
I agree - but there must be something in the water - every time I am
posting something you guys want to come back with some obscure,
irrelevant comparison as a counter argument. We were talking about 450+
horsepower performance sedans from AMG, NOT dump trucks or cloth
interiored 6 cyl. stripper e-classes that are used for taxis (which
behave completely differently than the high hp. versions). If the AMG
versions were fun to drive, reliable and marketable (as you stated),
don't you guys think they would build them? Why do you think they
didn't sell manual trans. SL's and SLK's for very long in the US? Why
don't they have manual trans S-class cars? Because the cars are too
heavy, don't drive well and the buyers of those cars don't want to buy a
large, heavy but fast luxo-barge with a manual. Why do you think BMW
was only offering the M5's with SMG's at first? Because they were
cheaper to build? BUT, if the reason Mercedes does not sell manual
trans. AMG models here in the states is because of market demand, I am
also curious as to why you think they don't offer them in Europe
either? If there is a market there then the reason must be something
other than that alone.
Mr.Wuss
Dennis Liu wrote:
Managing Partner, Private Label Chauffeur Services
www.PrivateLabelLimo.com
President, Brian Buxton Enterprises, Inc.
Nationwide Enclosed Auto Transportation
www.BuxtonMotorsports.com/storage-transportation.php
Mr.Wuss
Dennis Liu wrote:
Dude, what are you smokin'? The "cars are too heavy for a manual"? Brian, MB *sells* cheap e-class sedans in other parts of the world WITH a *MANUAL TRANSMISSION*. While the AMG may be a few pounds heavier than an E300, the reason MB doesn't sell them here with an automatic is not because of the car's WEIGHT. Rather, it's a function of market demand - there aren't enough buyers for an E55 with a manual transmission, because, well, MB buyers are girls!!!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!
Seriously, MB took a look at the market, decided that a small % of E55 sales would be with a manual, and concluded that it wouldn't be worth the effort. True for almost its entire range here in the US (MB used to offer a manual in the SLK, dunno if they still do).
As opposed to BMW, which offers a manual transmission in the 3-series,
5-series, 6-series, X3, X5, Z4 roadster and coupe, not to mention the Z8.
And all of its M cars too (yeah, the new M5 and M6 are getting real 6-speed
manuals).
That's because real men (and women) who know how to drive and appreciate the feel of a perfectly timed heel-toe downshift will always enjoy driving a sports car (or a sport sedan) with a manual transmission. Whereas girls drive MBs. :-)
Kidding aside, go back and reread what I wrote. I did not say that automatic trannies suck, simply that if I'm buying something that's a sports car, or a sports sedan, or even has pretentions of being such, ***I WANT A MANUAL***. Heck, I've OWNED a couple of big German cars with automatics, and I've LOVED them. And I've driven a variety of AMGs, and they sure were fun when you stepped on the gas. But as a whole, they were soft, HEAVY, and blech. I will probably always own a big German sedan, but I acknowledge that it is what it is - a big heavy sedan that's well suited for an automatic, perfect for sitting in traffic and hauling the family around.
But if I wanted a SPORTS SEDAN with 500hp that SHOULD be fun to drive, I'm going to get one with a stick. You wuss! :-)
Vty,
--Dennis
________________________________
From: Brian E. Buxton [mailto:BrianBuxton [at] BuxtonMotorsports.com] Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 12:39 PM
To: BigHeadDennis [at] earthlink.net
Cc: The FerrariList
Subject: Re: [Ferrari] [NFC] 2003 BMW M5?
I may be a wuss, but have you driven one? Mercedes new 5 and 7 speed trannies are *excellent,* and the cars are too heavy for a manual.
Brian
Dennis Liu wrote:
Brian Buxton wrote:
The M5 is a great car ... I am more of a Mercedes-Benz
person and
personally would opt for an 03 E55 AMG with 469 hp. & 516 ft.-lb.
torque for
about the same money. But an M5 is a great way to haul 4 people
around in
comfort, safety and speed! I think the price seems a bit high for
the
mileage, although the warranty is a plus that cannot easily be
duplicated in
the aftermarket ... but for just a few dollars more I can get you about 38K LESS miles!
http://www.buxtonmotorsports.com/10.php
====================
Ah, BMW v MB. Another classic battle. My $0.02 - the AMGs are for
girls
(and no, I don't mean females, I mean __GIRLS__). Awesome concept,
forever
hobbled by that slushbox automatic transmission. I think the most
beautiful
German sedan available now is the CLS, and I'd LOVE to have a CLS55,
but
ain't no way - not if I can only get an automatic.
Now, don't get me wrong, I have nothing against automatics per se.
It's
just that if I'm buying a sports car, or even a big sedan that's
ostensibly
sporty in nature, then I want a damn manual transmission. I love my
740iL
with the auto, and I'm thinking about buying another one (or even a
750).
But I'm not going to get the "M" version with an automatic. I don't
even
like the SMG versions. Heck, that's why the current M5 has been on
my sh*t
list, because the BMW SMG tranny bites it, big time. And why I've
been
waiting and waiting and waiting for my 430, with a manual 6-speed
(who knows
if I'll EVER get one).
Bottom line, the AMG is just plain ridiculous. What's the point of
all that
power and stiff suspension if you can't enjoy driving the dang thing
because
of the slushbox? Might as well get the E500/E550 (or CLS550) and
save $15k.
You'll still have every bit as much fun.
AMG, Brian? You wuss. :-P
Vty,
--Dennis
-- Brian E. Buxton
President, Buxton Motorsports, Inc . www.BuxtonMotorsports.com (812) 476-2281 x 209 Member ThaList.com
Managing Partner, Private Label Chauffeur Services
www.PrivateLabelLimo.com
President, Brian Buxton Enterprises, Inc.
Nationwide Enclosed Auto Transportation
www.BuxtonMotorsports.com/storage-transportation.php
Founder & Past President SO. IN Region PCA www.pca.org/soi
- Re: [NFC] 2003 BMW M5?, (continued)
- Re: [NFC] 2003 BMW M5? Brian E. Buxton, September 28 2006
- Re: [NFC] 2003 BMW M5? Dave Craig, September 28 2006
- Re: [NFC] 2003 BMW M5? Brian E. Buxton, September 28 2006
- Re: [NFC] 2003 BMW M5? Dennis Liu, September 28 2006
- Re: [NFC] 2003 BMW M5? Brian E. Buxton, September 28 2006
- Re: [NFC] 2003 BMW M5? Jim Conforti, September 28 2006
- Re: [NFC] 2003 BMW M5? Dennis Liu, September 28 2006
- Are you too heavy for my stick? Brian E. Buxton, September 28 2006
- Re: Are you too heavy for my stick? Hans E. Hansen, September 28 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.