Re: Ferrari ABS | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Brian E. Buxton (BrianBuxton![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:45:14 -0800 (PST) |
You sure you spoke to the owner of my car? I am the owner ... it's not
a consignment. And the 88.5's didn't have ABS. 89 only!
Brian
LtWacko [at] aol.com wrote:
I am a big fan of non-abs cars. I like the pedal feel. HOWEVER, when I finally tracked and autocrossed an ABS equipped car, my tires were lasting much longer. A set of r-compound tires would only last me a month on a non-abs car. They tend to go "square" with my aggressive driving. On my autocross vehicle, I actually got three months out of a set that usually only lasted a month. Same vehicle model but different year which had the ABS available. Now my question goes to those that have owned or driven both types of F cars. As far as particular model, the 328. Now I am not talking about you sissies out there who only cruise and have never been on the other side of the pit wall. I want an opinion of those who have tracked their cars. Tires are expensive and non-renewable. I would spend $600 a month back in the day on tires on a non-abs car. I am looking at a 328 but I might consider a later year for the abs. Before you try and sell me Brian, I have spoken to the owner of the car you have on consignment (88.5). There are cheaper ones being earlier and non-abs equipped. I am just trying do research and see if it's worth the extra money besides the other benefits of a later model. The one you have would be one I would consider knowing it's service history.
Thanks.
Rodney
-
Ferrari ABS LtWacko, January 25 2007
- Re: Ferrari ABS Brian E. Buxton, January 25 2007
- Re: Ferrari ABS Dennis Liu, January 25 2007
-
Re: Ferrari ABS LtWacko, January 25 2007
- Re: Ferrari ABS Brian E. Buxton, January 25 2007
- Re: Ferrari ABS LtWacko, January 25 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.